Jump to content

Kyle Communications

Moderators
  • Posts

    6,583
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    93

6 Followers

About Kyle Communications

  • Birthday 23/05/1959

Information

  • Aircraft
    ICP Savannah VG XL/ S and Rans S21 Outbound
  • Location
    Burpengary East
  • Country
    Australia

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Kyle Communications's Achievements

Well-known member

Well-known member (3/3)

  1. KR. either way they cost pretty much the same. I went with both being TSO versions...then there was no drama. had my money back in 4 weeks and if I wish I can now go into CTA with that hardware without any issue. You will never be allowed CTA with a SE2. So I just bit the bullet and did it the certified way then there was absolutely no issue. I looked at the financial differences and for me...it was worth the sh@t fight.
  2. I am told ATC can see the SE2 as several plots have been called by ATC and they dont have mode C on board only SE2. But maybe in their MOP's ATC are not supposed to use it so who knows but ATC were supposed to be going to see them..it really is a software thing that would be easily implemented for ATC Mark
  3. For ADSB out to comply it must have a proper certified GPS source. I bought the Uavionix TailbeaconX. They used to sell a "experimental" version of it but now only sell the TSO'd version. To comply you do need the GNSS certified GPS source. You can use another brand but I also bought the AV-30 from Uavionix which has that certified source inbuilt and fully complys. The AV-30 also does a hell of a lot of other stuff pretty much to the point you dont need a EFIS but any certified source comes at a price. basically the Transponder was about 4k and the AV-30 was about 4k..but with the rebate I got both of them for 4k...Also dont forget this is only ADSB OUT...for IN I will use my SE2..you turn off the transmitter and use the SE2 as your ADSB IN Or of course you can use another solution like a Raspberry Pi setup or a Stratus or one of the many others as your ADSB IN setup. I build my own aircraft and I just signed off the installation as me myself and I....There was no issue getting the rebate at all. Of course though you need the instruments all tested every 2 years by a licenced person to do so as I am not licenced to do that even though I spent 30 years in the radio/satellite comms industry doing board level repais and tuning and testing. I have never applied to get the necessary paperwork crap to get my licence to sign off on the avionics
  4. I should have some available in a week or so...just waiting on some main bars to be welded
  5. If you watched the video Nev they only want the motor back for a internal issue to find out why. Also to determine a fix or change to a process .Any thing else thats a bolt on is a replacment part
  6. The video posted the other day said warranty was 3 years or 500 hrs..if it has a actual mechanical issue with the engine they will give you a new one and want to old complete engine back. Thats pretty good and shows they do want to make it a good engine..warranty with Rotax is always a fight and certainly not 3 years. I dont believe anyone in OZ has taken on a dealership yet but you would need a proper service and mech backup shop to do it correctly. If the engine was about 20k aussie then I think its very viable for that price certainly in the beginning of them trying to get units out there. I am not sure though of the current Floods price for a 912ULS but last time I heard it was 35k but dont forget that was no exhaust or oil cooler or radiater either..thats for a out of time swap engine
  7. I enquired direct to Zongshen about them when they first appeared about 2 or 3 years ago..they wanted you to buy 4 engines to be a dealer and at the time they would have been about 28k aussie..the rotax was 32k aussie
  8. 26k US$ is about 38K aussie.....the rotax here is about the same price now
  9. CKD ZS Engine – CKD Aero SHOP.CKD.AERO
  10. The USA and Canada agent has pricing on the website and its only a couple of thousand less in the USA than a genuine rotax
  11. They are not that much cheaper than a rotax though....if they were 10k cheaper then ok but they are only about 5k cheaper
  12. Yes it is a shame that you have been F@$ked over like this. yet there are a number of jabs flying that have had CAR35 i think it is. We had one at Caboolture airfield for a few years then it was sold. Not sure where it went to. I could find out if you want as I know the school operator. and it was RAA rego not GA I am sure. The new owner of jabiru hopefully sees the light and does one with a Rotax up the front hopefully he is not as pig headed as old Rodney about these things. They would sell a heap of Jabs with Rotax...there are still a lot of potential buyers out there that just dont trust the jab engine...I am not trying to start a flame war here just stating a fact. But now Stiffy is not the controlling partner maybe some improvements could be made as the Jab has been proved as a good safe airframe.
  13. I bought it to keep my bolly at the time in good nick for the engine. It has balanced quite a lot of engines now since I have had it. I have a L2 that borrows it a bit when servicing some aircraft even GA ones it has done. It was probably some overkill really for just my aircraft but at the time I was a bit flush and could spare the cost without a second thought. I of course do Eprop and they are all prebalanced but I dont think I would ever sell it. Its what I class as "test equipment"...There are some things I will never sell. That is all my very expensive RF test equipment and other electronic test gear also my lathe and my CNC Mill..There are some things once you manage to either fund or beg borrow or steal that you end up never selling. They only go when they are broken beyond repair or its by the execetor of your will....I think its a thing that most radio techs do. I bet if you ask RFGuy he doesnt get rid of his prized test equipment even if you only use it once a year 🙂
  14. I have a dynavibe..they work well. Bought it secondhand for about 1200 quite a few years ago now.
  15. No they are typically FETS..they are a voltage device rather than a current based device. Essentially they work like a switch when you place a voltage onto the gate and the drain and source then conduct. They are still semiconductors but they dont have any gain like a transistor does. I am trying to keep this as simple as I can because this subject is huge now. FETS are almost taking over the world 🙂 They are silicon switch for a better word. FETS are really common now and most of all your solar inverters and your power inverters etc..anything that switches on and off ans fast they are generally FETS now. They can take a crap load of current through them because their "on resistance" is very small. A lot of FETS have resistance across the junction like 0.28 of an ohm when turned on and even less. There is a mininum voltage that they turn on with but there is still a current limit as the junction resistance is not the lowest until the voltage gets to a higher level. There are so many types of FETS now its crazy...infact RF Output devices are commonly FETS now and are used regularly ...and I am talking lots of power. LDMOS type ones are regularly 1.5kw RF out Infact the main RF output device in a Xcom airband radio is a FET
×
×
  • Create New...