Jump to content

Steel Bungee Replacement for Zenith Aircraft


eightyknots

Recommended Posts

Looks a bit heavy! Need a new W&B after this one.

Here is a bit of extra information: http://www.shop.vikingaircraftengines.com/Steel-Bungee-for-Zenith-aircraft-Zenith-spring.htm .

 

The important thing is weight. By removing the original and replacing it with this, how much net weight gain will there be? I think a W & B is probably warranted.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Here is a bit of extra information: http://www.shop.vikingaircraftengines.com/Steel-Bungee-for-Zenith-aircraft-Zenith-spring.htm .The important thing is weight. By removing the original and replacing it with this, how much net weight gain will there be? I think a W & B is probably warranted.

I think there is a bit more to consider than that. If you look at that link, you will see this "The Preloading of the spring is handled internal to the spring, using an adjustable rod, providing no force to the airframe while in flight. The ramp effect of the original plastic material has been milled away and the steering arms now ride on a flat surface.". The ramp effect is there for a reason. It is a bit of a pain, but it is also necessary. With the all flying tail, you need a centring force on the rudder, and that's what the ramps are for. Milling them flat is altogether too casual an approach. If that is done, you will need to provide some centring springs for the rudder pedals. Unlike the ramps, these will provide additional resistance to turns when taxying. It is one of the disagreeable aspects of the 701's handling in flight, that there is such a self centring tendency, but not having it can be more disagreeable.

 

Other than that, it looks like one of the better thought out ideas from Jan, and it is even reasonably priced.

 

Regards,

 

Paul

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anything is weak on the Zen STOL's it's the nose gear and the bungee! I don't like it, never have but since I'm going to put on amphibs in the near future I was never too worried about it. I've had issues with Jan but this is one of his better ideas. Reports are that milling the block causes no issues, but if you are worried about it I'm sure you can leave it as is. The steering (rudder) is tight while the weight is OFF the nose, it's actually easier to move on the ground. The pre-load option makes it easier to move in the air. I'm looking at getting this, but I'd probably leave the notch in the block anyways. If it's greased up well, it's usually not that bad. My $0.02. :)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anything is weak on the Zen STOL's it's the nose gear and the bungee! I don't like it, never have but since I'm going to put on amphibs in the near future I was never too worried about it. I've had issues with Jan but this is one of his better ideas. Reports are that milling the block causes no issues, but if you are worried about it I'm sure you can leave it as is. The steering (rudder) is tight while the weight is OFF the nose, it's actually easier to move on the ground.:)

That's what I said - "Unlike the ramps, these [centring springs] will provide additional resistance to turns when taxying.".. :)

 

The ramp angles are there by design, not accident, so it is cavalier to remove them without knowing why they are there, don't you think? The least one should do is talk it over with Caleb. They don't mind you reducing the angle some...

 

The nose bungee does wear out - but it doesn't do so without warning, and it usually fails gracefully. I don't have the ring on my nose leg, as I want the full travel and that restricts it unnecessarily and can result in a bent leg (and prop). I've put a 45 degree bend in my nose wheel axle as a result of a vicious gust - the bungee part and the rest of the structure seemed quite content. As it was a graceful enough failure, I replaced it with another as per the plans, though I have made a stronger one as a spare in case it starts forming a habit.

 

For a very light aircraft, the coil spring set up does look a bit heavier than a lacky band... weight control is pretty high on my list of priorities.

 

Are you making your own floats? I've seriously thought about putting water skis on, there is a good body of test data on "universal landing gear", with wheel penetrating skis to operate on water, snow, etc All you need is a little beach to taxi to and from. I know it sounds quite mad, but there was considerable real world testing on it in the fifties, that was supplanted by further development of helicopters.

 

Cheers,

 

Paul

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
  • 1 month later...
I think there is a bit more to consider than that. If you look at that link, you will see this "The Preloading of the spring is handled internal to the spring, using an adjustable rod, providing no force to the airframe while in flight. The ramp effect of the original plastic material has been milled away and the steering arms now ride on a flat surface.". The ramp effect is there for a reason. It is a bit of a pain, but it is also necessary. With the all flying tail, you need a centring force on the rudder, and that's what the ramps are for. Milling them flat is altogether too casual an approach. If that is done, you will need to provide some centring springs for the rudder pedals. Unlike the ramps, these will provide additional resistance to turns when taxying. It is one of the disagreeable aspects of the 701's handling in flight, that there is such a self centring tendency, but not having it can be more disagreeable.Other than that, it looks like one of the better thought out ideas from Jan, and it is even reasonably priced.

 

Regards,

 

Paul

Hi Paul

 

I have just flown with similar unit to the Viking spring. Yes, you are right, no need to mill out the V, because the rudder feel comes OK once the bungee is removed And you are right on ground handling - I surprised myself a bit on landing first time so better use ballet slippers than workboots. Not really, but it is much lighter with the spring than with the bungee so a light touch on the pedals is needed. I had 900hrs with bungees, never go back...

 

Peter

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi PaulI have just flown with similar unit to the Viking spring. Yes, you are right, no need to mill out the V, because the rudder feel comes OK once the bungee is removed And you are right on ground handling - I surprised myself a bit on landing first time so better use ballet slippers than workboots. Not really, but it is much lighter with the spring than with the bungee so a light touch on the pedals is needed. I had 900hrs with bungees, never go back...

 

Peter

Thanks for the info Peter.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
Hi Jabirupilot,Hi Marty, basically the same as the viking but different enough to not run foul of copyright.

 

Using steel springcap instead of aluminium & Aust made spring of round wire instead of rectangular.

 

Next time the cowl is off, will try to get ya a piccy. Not as pretty as the viking but still effective.

 

Cheers Roger.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Have any of the

 

Now I remember. Thanks for the pics!

Subject: Latest from Viking

 

Latest from Viking

 

 

200th Steel Bungee sold

 

 

Viking Turbo 170 Flying through its first 200 hours

 

 

Compare with UL 350 max torque of 236 ft.lb to Viking 130 at 286 ft.lb

 

 

170 HP to altitude. The Viking 170

 

 

Viking Turbo engines - 460 ft.lb at 2000 prop rpm

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...