Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've seen a few occasions when Lightwings have been really planted-on, and everyone around goes "Jeez, thank god they're tough, many others would'nt have got away with that". Probably a bit like the Auster in that regards, "bouncey, bouncey!" if not done right.

 

 

Posted
I've seen a few occasions when Lightwings have been really planted-on, and everyone around goes "Jeez, thank god they're tough, many others would'nt have got away with that". Probably a bit like the Auster in that regards, "bouncey, bouncey!" if not done right.

Yes there a tough little plane much like a j 3 cubbie me thinks !

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Thanks Maj. I suppose 100 or 80 hp is going to be much more effective than 65! With the 582 powered Lifhtwing, it gets very thirsty to try and maintain anything over 65.

 

 

Posted
well done doug, i'll get in the sav and come see you one day.. i'll ring 1st so i dont get eaten by the resident angry cattle dog!

Cheers mate I plan to fly down your way as well .

 

 

Posted

I'm only new to lightwings, but my supposedly slippery Gr912 with the 100hp engine still often ends up somewhere between 65 and 70 at 5200rpm one up unless i'm loosing a fair bit of height... I haven't flown it much and when I did fly it, the air was a bit thermally but all I could remember was the previous owner saying "she'll do 82 knots one up or 75 with two on board fully loaded.

 

I must say though that the big wing can be felt when you get near the ground and it makes it fairly plush compared to faster aircraft i've flown.

 

 

Posted

U will get that speed but ya have to set up on the step first mate if u look at your wingtip u should be level with the horizon and have a slightly nose Down attitude , well that how my old girl flew at 70 kn she had a 582 ..

 

 

Guest Maj Millard
Posted

nunans........bit of a touchy subject right now, but what prop are you spinning on your plane, PM me if you like ...................................................Cheers.... ..Maj...048_surrender.gif.737a6283dfb1349140cc8b959302f540.gif

 

 

  • 9 months later...
Posted
Doug, That first aircraft in your first post (19-3263) is pretty interesting, and one I haven't seen before. Where was that photo taken ?It appears to have a non-standard fiberglass fuselage, early nosewheel and flaps fitted to a standard wing with exterior flap control rods. The tail is all different also, (huge elevator !)no doubt due to the different fuselage. I wonder if it is still around ?...............Maj...024_cool.gif.7a88a3168ebd868f5549631161e2b369.gif

fibreglass body did look good would a heavier body mean more stable in flight i wonder what size fuel tanks etc.am only just learning now but the lightwing does seem to be popular

 

 

Posted
fibreglass body did look good would a heavier body mean more stable in flight i wonder what size fuel tanks etc.am only just learning now but the lightwing does seem to be popular

It was for sale a few month back don't know much about her history I

Believe she was one of the first made but was too heavy to fit the class at the. Time .

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...