Gibbo Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 The copy of the advice (that I remember..) basically used the 'business' model of a board appointment not the associations act (and our elections regs etc) that are appointed via an election of the members. Incomplete advice provided to the lawyer..
damkia Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 Well said AR.Once the RAA's own lawyers prove that member Runciman is not President, the membership will expect him to reimburse RAA for airfares and accommodation associated with the Board Meeting on Feb 8th and the GM on Feb 9th. He can get himself there and bear the costs the same way that the rest of us have to. And he & Middo can pay for the legal advice associated with this resignation issue too, which they have both clearly caused to be incurred. Plus members can rightly expect member Runciman to do the same for any other costs that he has incurred on RAA's behalf since the minute of his resignation. Let's not forget reimbursing any and all costs of any actions of the RA-Aus which have been signed of as him as "President" since his resignation. My gut feeling is that anything signed off since the resignation will be null and void, possibly including any of the administrative work behind the registration issues of late, and their subsequent renewals.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now