Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's right Yenn, and the Senate started looking into a few other things, and the Minister is now a little bit more aware that there may be an epidemic of problems out here.......and then these idiots come along and provide more direct evidence of where to go looking for some corrective action and people to make examples of....some rough justice.

 

 

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Most of the issues with Hempel were of a medical nature and the fact he would have flown anyway. Non compliance doesn't make the rules right or wrong per se. I think the DAME came in for some criticism. None of these "events" make it better for those of us who want to fly, and are prepared to do the right thing. Nev

 

 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

So after all the discussion I still contend!

 

Who Will give Me a joy-flight for a contribution to their fuel cost.

 

Lets test the law, might even take photo,s heaven forbid.

 

spacesailor

 

 

Posted

What you're describing there is a cost sharing arrangement, and you can look up on the CASA site the limits under which that can legally take place, but from memory you can contribute up to 50% of the cost (which by the way would not be enough to make it worthwhile for a pilot to do for a living.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...