Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am in the sounds like Bullshite faction.

 

If a bird can wreck havoc on a airframe even a light one- then how come a drone made no damage at all?

 

Probably should have drug tested the pilot.

 

 

Posted

a drone would do less damage to an aircraft, as its a lot less dense than a bird.. most consumer grade drones are nothing but a circuit board, in a plastic housing, 4 small engines the size of a pile of a few coins stacked up, and a battery, the battery being 90% of its weight. and the battery density is no more than the muscle density of a bird..

 

 

Posted

I guess I thought a drone that is at 2500ft would be more substantial than that.

 

I was thinking it would have been aircraft style drone not a quadcopter for it to be visible to a pilot.

 

But I am often wrong.

 

I know any of my RC aircraft that could cruise at 2500ft would make a mess.

 

 

Posted
a drone would do less damage to an aircraft, as its a lot less dense than a bird.. most consumer grade drones are nothing but a circuit board, in a plastic housing, 4 small engines the size of a pile of a few coins stacked up, and a battery, the battery being 90% of its weight. and the battery density is no more than the muscle density of a bird..

Something like a DJI Phantom could weigh nearly 2 kgs and do heaps of damage, what sort of bird are you thinking of a Pelican?

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...