bexrbetter Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 It's like all the other theories, what ever can't be proven is a fit.
Old Koreelah Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 This maybe? Thanks to my next door neighbour for the following thought provoking email... Why does no one mention the Indian Oceans most advanced and secure air base, the stationary Aircraft Carrier located south of the southern tip of India called Diego Garcia? I did, Rank: http://www.recreationalflying.com/threads/malaysian-airlines-mh370.114558/page-10#post-418067 Your conspiracy theory is intriguing, but why would the Americans cover up this attack?
Teckair Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 I did, Rank:http://www.recreationalflying.com/threads/malaysian-airlines-mh370.114558/page-10#post-418067 Your conspiracy theory is intriguing, but why would the Americans cover up this attack? Maybe shooting an airliner down might be bad PR?
rgmwa Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 The most powerful radar systems in the region are at Diego Garcia. A perfect target for such an attack,... Sounds like a very good reason NOT to attack. rgmwa 1
rankamateur Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Maybe shooting an airliner down might be bad PR? Especially one half full of chinese nationals. Didn't you know that if Walmart was a country it would be China's fourth biggest trading partner. America is selling out to China at the rate of three TRILLION dollars per annum, don't want to upset the banker now do we! 1
flying dog Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Yeah, well so are we...... :( Which is killing the whole country.
SDQDI Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 And the Debris from a shot down 777 wouldn't spread real far would it, and wouldn't be hard to pick up and leave no trace, not that I'm arguing too much but seriously the debris trail from a shot down jumbo would be fairly significant. 1
bexrbetter Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Yeah, well so are we...... :(Which is killing the whole country. I get a lot of approaches over the last 10 years from people who are interested in doing something in China and the bulk of them have the same reasoning and it ain't the costs, it's the restrictions and regulations that they have to continually battle against. They have had a gutful of putting 90% of their effort in for the various Governments and the feeling, true or not, that the Governments would prefer them not to be in business. I'm just the messenger by the way 1
Bob Llewellyn Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Kitchener was on HMS Hampshire, not Edinburgh. HMS Hampshire ran into a mine laid by a U-boat, not an unexpected naval force. Even Jessop in his book admits the coffin story was only a rumour he dug up in an old file. Various colourful rumours were not uncommon regarding sinkings........or aircraft disappearances for that matter! Sorry Dutchroll, overlooked your post. Look you, the more insubstantial a rumour, the more likely it is true - because it's insubstantial because "they" are trying to hush it up, not because it's a load of earwax. (where are my pills...)
Bob Llewellyn Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 I get a lot of approaches over the last 10 years from people who are interested in doing something in China and the bulk of them have the same reasoning and it ain't the costs, it's the restrictions and regulations that they have to continually battle against.They have had a gutful of putting 90% of their effort in for the various Governments and the feeling, true or not, that the Governments would prefer them not to be in business. I'm just the messenger by the way I know of a business that had definite QC issues with the Chinese workforce - quite hi-tech by Chinese standards, but regarded materials specs as no more than labels. Can this be coped with? How? 1
Old Koreelah Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Maybe shooting an airliner down might be bad PR? Fair enough; I should have read the whole story before posting. Those damned Yanks: it's always their fault! 1
bexrbetter Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 I know of a business that had definite QC issues with the Chinese workforce - quite hi-tech by Chinese standards, but regarded materials specs as no more than labels. Can this be coped with? How? Because your friends wrongly believed that their standards of business dealings would be consistent in a completely different country and business culture, they were niave. Pop me a PM if they need help. "quite high tech by Chinese standards"?? .... are you serious, Shirley?
bexrbetter Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Maybe shooting an airliner down might be bad PR? Yeah, the World wasn't too happy with the Russians were they - twice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Air_Lines_Flight_007 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_Air_Lines_Flight_902 1
Exadios Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 This maybe? Thanks to my next door neighbour for the following thought provoking emailWhy hasn't someone put an aircraft carrier there, which could stay on station, rather than planes from everywhere flying out for 2 hours search daily. How many millions is it costing for these planes? I reckon the money would be better spent on a carrier with helicopters. If it wasn't such a tragic event we could all freely laugh with great gusto at the mainstream media regarding the disappearance of Malaysian flight 370. Every single source, substantiated or not, was taken as a great revelation. It was and continues to be a sad circus of events. If those following the serious clues left available there is only one question to ask. Why does no one mention the Indian Oceans most advanced and secure air base, the stationary Aircraft Carrier located south of the southern tip of India called Diego Garcia? Not a peep. Not even an indication of a US managed military installation that monitors everything in this war region. In fact the best old metaphor regarding the lack of reference to this location is "The Silence Is Deafening." So here it is. As CNN, Fox, MSNBC, CBC, BBC, CTV and all the rest are prepared to spout off theories without any solid confirmation, here is one from a source who wishes to remain unidentified from Northwest BC Canada. This individual comes from a three decade long background of exposing the secrets the one percent and the military forces would rather have remained secret. He has recently revealed what happened to flight 370. 'Film at Eleven'. Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah prepared and practised with his home flight simulator and had determined the maximum speed and angle of decent the Boeing 777 could withstand. As soon as the flight reached the extent of the Malaysian radar capability, when he knew they would no longer expect to see his radar signal, he wished the ground crews good night. He then turned off one tracking device, waited to see if anyone responded or raised alarm for 15 minutes, then turned off all communication devices. He locked the cabin door to prevent anyone from entering after asking his co-pilot to get him a drink or check on a system outside of the cockpit. The Captain then immediately turned the plane southwest into a know flight path and climbed to over 40,000 ft. the maximum structural capability of the Boeing 777. He put on the pilot supplied air mask and kept the plane at over 40,000 ft until he was certain all the passengers and crew, including his co-pilot, were asphyxiated. From his flight simulator experimentation he had already determined the precise coordinates where he would initiate his next action. To bring the plane down at the maximum speed and maximum angle of decent to make a direct hit on the fuel storage tanks at Diego Garcia. As he initiated this direct course of action the American Military had not been concerned with the radar blip of this flight at 40,000 plus feet. They monitor vessels and flights which appear to be a threat or are invading their space. However they were suddenly brought into complete attention as their warning systems set off alarms. The base at Diego Garcia attempted to make radio contact and immediately dispatching interceptors. Knowing full well this was an imminent threat, having no time to debate the issue and recognizing the aircraft was operating in what was basically 'stealth' mode, uncommunicative, the plane was shot out of the sky. Becoming aware of which flight it was with the political and potential military repercussions, the US military ordered a complete lock down on all communications regarding the event and began dispatching crews to locate and pick up all the debris. When the rest of the world became aware the flight was missing the US Navy offered all their resource to help them look for it in the South China Sea, then the Gulf of Thailand, Bay of Bengal and the Strait of Malacca. This kept the worlds attention focused away from the location they were cleaning up. US 7th Fleet Commander William Marks told CNN "We wait for the Malaysians to tell us where to search and we go there." This is the most telling statement of all. Since when does the US take directions from Malaysia unless they are simply providing the rope to let them hang themselves. The most powerful radar systems in the region are at Diego Garcia. A perfect target for such an attack, one the USA stopped and one they simply cannot reveal to the world due to the nationality of the passengers on board. They will continue to assist in the search while doing everything to ensure no one even mentions Diego Garcia in the mainstream media. Firstly, please supply your bank account number so that we can forward the charges for keeping an aircraft carrier on station. Second, have you computed the horizon centered on Diego Garcia? For the rest of the post - you have failed to supply evidence needed to give you speculations any credibility at all. 1
bexrbetter Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Firstly, please supply your bank account number so that we can forward the charges for keeping an aircraft carrier on station.. Well hang on, that Carrier isn't in packed in cotton wool in storage, it operates and costs the same money daily regardless of where it is. For the rest of the post - you have failed to supply evidence needed to give you speculations any credibility at all. Errr, that's why they are called speculations!
rankamateur Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Firstly, please supply your bank account number so that we can forward the charges for keeping an aircraft carrier on station.Second, have you computed the horizon centered on Diego Garcia? For the rest of the post - you have failed to supply evidence needed to give you speculations any credibility at all. You are taking this a bit too seriously, all this talk of supplying my evidence. The fact of the matter is there is no evidence, there has been six weeks with a string of well ballsed up distractions to take care of any embarrassing evidence, if in fact there was any.
johnm Posted May 7, 2014 Posted May 7, 2014 who knows where MH370 is or why its there any theory is worth considering we don't have too many options at this stage the best we have is a auto submerged computer looking for aluminium in potential sludge 3 miles below water level if the 777 hit the water (or suffered some other fate in the ocean) ................ this does not explain why there was no debris finding ANY debris will be helpful 1
bexrbetter Posted May 14, 2014 Posted May 14, 2014 https://www.google.com.hk/search?newwindow=1&safe=strict&biw=854&bih=622&site=webhp&q=australia+90+Million+for+mh370+search&oq=australia+90+Million+for+mh370+search&gs_l=serp.3...2406.14366.0.14926.37.33.0.3.3.0.424.4181.2-15j1j1.17.0....0...1c.1.43.serp..23.14.2661.Q_nPHsbWHVs I don't get it, why has Australia committed $90 million for 2 years of searching for an airplane that's got barely anything to do with us? 2
ayavner Posted May 14, 2014 Posted May 14, 2014 not to worry, we're paying for it out of the pensions
Teckair Posted May 14, 2014 Posted May 14, 2014 not to worry, we're paying for it out of the pensions Great priorities our fearless leaders have.
Teckair Posted May 14, 2014 Posted May 14, 2014 https://www.google.com.hk/search?newwindow=1&safe=strict&biw=854&bih=622&site=webhp&q=australia 90 Million for mh370 search&oq=australia 90 Million for mh370 search&gs_l=serp.3...2406.14366.0.14926.37.33.0.3.3.0.424.4181.2-15j1j1.17.0....0...1c.1.43.serp..23.14.2661.Q_nPHsbWHVsI don't get it, why has Australia committed $90 million for 2 years of searching for an airplane that's got barely anything to do with us? I think there will be more to this than we are told, as per usual. The search might be something just to appear to be doing something, right? Is there anybody happy with the way our taxes are spent?
Old Koreelah Posted May 14, 2014 Posted May 14, 2014 I think there will be more to this than we are told, as per usual. The search might be something just to appear to be doing something, right? Is there anybody happy with the way our taxes are spent? When we are telling our grandies (or their kids) about "the good old days", we can say we remember when MH370 dissappeared. Just like the Titanic or the Bermuda Triangle, this case will be folklore. Given the gains in training and operational experience (and to our international relations) it's not a big outlay, especially when compared to the billions spent on recent wars.
Cosmick Posted May 14, 2014 Posted May 14, 2014 https://www.google.com.hk/search?newwindow=1&safe=strict&biw=854&bih=622&site=webhp&q=australia 90 Million for mh370 search&oq=australia 90 Million for mh370 search&gs_l=serp.3...2406.14366.0.14926.37.33.0.3.3.0.424.4181.2-15j1j1.17.0....0...1c.1.43.serp..23.14.2661.Q_nPHsbWHVsI don't get it, why has Australia committed $90 million for 2 years of searching for an airplane that's got barely anything to do with us? International Relations - pretty cheap for some nice Chinese warm fuzzies
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now