Marty_d Posted March 21, 2014 Posted March 21, 2014 Looks damn impressive to me, although that may just be the pretty graphics and 3D CAD renderings.
farri Posted March 21, 2014 Posted March 21, 2014 Thanks Marty! Impressive it is but will it ever make it to the market place? Frank.
Marty_d Posted March 21, 2014 Author Posted March 21, 2014 Don't know, but I like their stats... http://www.dukeengines.com/application/aviation/ 103Hp at 3300 RPM on 2.0 litre engine weighing 46kg with no need for a gearbox, and the rotating engine partially cancels out gyroscopic effects. Plus it's got a nice cylindrical shape making it easier to cowl nicely!
facthunter Posted March 21, 2014 Posted March 21, 2014 You will have to fit a radiator somewhere. It is designed like a swashplate variable output hydraulic pump. Nerv
Marty_d Posted March 21, 2014 Author Posted March 21, 2014 True. Chin mounted radiator perhaps. I think the general idea is very clever though.
Old Koreelah Posted March 21, 2014 Posted March 21, 2014 Why do we have two threads on this engine? http://www.recreationalflying.com/threads/the-duke-axial-engine.115231/
spacesailor Posted March 21, 2014 Posted March 21, 2014 But I missed how the head gasket fits, if the cylinders are moving. spacesailor
Ultralights Posted March 21, 2014 Posted March 21, 2014 thats what im thinking, how do you keep the compression and combustion gas pressures in check with a moving cylinder and fixed head?
Old Koreelah Posted March 21, 2014 Posted March 21, 2014 My Ducati had no head gaskets. Compression relied on a good overlap fit between head and barrel. Some of the sealing technology developed for Wankel rotaries might have been adapted to this engine.
Marty_d Posted March 21, 2014 Author Posted March 21, 2014 Why do we have two threads on this engine?http://www.recreationalflying.com/threads/the-duke-axial-engine.115231/ Sorry OK - I saw this on another site and got all excited about it, didn't think to search for it on this one! Moderator... please remove this thread.
Old Koreelah Posted March 21, 2014 Posted March 21, 2014 Sorry OK - I saw this on another site and got all excited about it, didn't think to search for it on this one!Moderator... please remove this thread. All good posts, Marty. Perhaps mod. can combine the two threads.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now