ozbear Posted November 30, 2014 Posted November 30, 2014 Another angle on this "incident": I think Thommo is flying that 1 1
ayavner Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 jeez that's going a bit far... most are plenty happy with a nice landing :-P
Birdseye Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Not a real virgin to be seen anywhere in that clip. 2
PA. Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 How to pick up chicks. Big chicks, bend your knees. 1
facthunter Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 POWERFULL chicks.... GET on your knees. Nev 1
johnm Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 Make a good ‘T shirt’ that P.A. – way better than ‘trainee gynaecologist’
ayavner Posted December 22, 2014 Posted December 22, 2014 "no experience, but i'll have a look at it for ya..."
PA. Posted January 2, 2015 Posted January 2, 2015 Make a good ‘T shirt’ that P.A. – way better than ‘trainee gynaecologist’ We are too slow. Buy um here.
kaz3g Posted January 2, 2015 Posted January 2, 2015 I think the fake explanation is just as much a fake as the original. Inverted wing "pulling" the aircraft to the ground AND asymmetric flap to get his FX to replicate the stunt? Where's DJPIL when I need him? Kaz
rankamateur Posted January 2, 2015 Posted January 2, 2015 We are too slow. Buy um here. And you too can look like the bloke in the photo, oh the joy!
flying dog Posted March 15, 2015 Posted March 15, 2015 Some one said it is impossible to roll a jumbo. You had better not tell Bob Hoover and his mates. I really seem to remember them doing it to "demonstrate" the 747 when it was first released.
dazza 38 Posted March 15, 2015 Posted March 15, 2015 Some one said it is impossible to roll a jumbo.You had better not tell Bob Hoover and his mates. I really seem to remember them doing it to "demonstrate" the 747 when it was first released. A 707 was rolled during a sales demonstration. Dunno about a 747 ever being rolled.
facthunter Posted March 15, 2015 Posted March 15, 2015 The vid is a fake. Dunno why you bother with it. Nev.
flying dog Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 Ah, you may be right Daz. However, I think if they could roll a 707 I am sure they could roll a 74. It is just they would possibly need a bit of time to get it right.
facthunter Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 A barrell roll done correctly won't stress a jet. You never get negative "G" so you don't even spill your coffee. It rolls about an axis well above the fuselage as you view it in the cockpit. Nev
ayavner Posted March 16, 2015 Posted March 16, 2015 And do it at 20,000 feet. Denzel can do it at 500...
Pilot Pete Posted March 31, 2015 Posted March 31, 2015 I tried it in my sleep. When I woke up I was still in one piece.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now