Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just see a 24 prefix on it so why the investigation?

 

 

Posted
Just see a 24 prefix on it so why the investigation?

RAAus investigate cases of structural failure also .

 

Bob

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Guest bluespot
Posted

Look at at the photo -- it is 24

 

Look at the video -- Mark is right about the suffix 770x

 

where x is not 0

 

 

Posted

Looks like one on cover of Sport Pilot April 2013.

 

 

Posted

Water is pretty hard when you slap a plane against it. There's hardly any can take waves of any size. or a mistake...Nev

 

 

  • Agree 1
Guest Maj Millard
Posted
Just see a 24 prefix on it so why the investigation?

24 is factory built...why wouldn't it be investigated ?.

 

 

Guest Maj Millard
Posted

There has been another incident in the Whitsundays with a Seamax involving a tail area structure failure a couple of years back, also a lucky escape. Aircraft was sent back to the factory for repairs and the owner is still awaiting its return. The company has since been sold to a US based concern ?.....I agree with Nev..there is a level of skill required for water landings , water being just as hard as dirt at speed. More details needed on this one but it would be entirely possible to incur that sort of damage if handed incorrectly.

 

 

Posted
24 is factory built...why wouldn't it be investigated ?.

not an atsb investigation i assume?

 

 

Guest Maj Millard
Posted
not an atsb investigation i assume?

Don't know Steve...ATSB can investigate anything they choose including RAA if they wish.

 

 

Posted

Lucky to get the ATSB to investigate a fatality........ Strange if they show this more than passing interest in this......

 

 

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...