Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dunno. No more skill than doing a landing off an ILS in rain and gusty crosswinds at night, at much slower speeds. Nev

 

 

Posted

No no no...CASA has said its fine as the aircraft is not powered by a Jabiru engine!

 

Now that's a humorous effort Nev, wouldn't you agree?

 

 

Posted

Talking about religion, sexism, mateship , atheism is OK but jabiru's .... DON'T go there. Same as politics. No GO zone.

 

As for evaluating humor, I've eliminated myself by poor performance, haven't I?

 

. Actually I still cling to the idea I'm terribly funny but only very perceptive people can pick up on it Nev

 

 

  • Haha 1
  • Winner 2
Posted

I've heard of the F word and the C word, so now I have to include the J word?

 

Ah the PC police are everywhere...nothing like taking a forum post and rapidly taking it off topic! Outstanding Nev what a team we make. Cheers Anthony

 

 

Posted

Chris Sperou does ribbon cuts at this height, inverted! And over solid ground. Admittedly, not in a Learjet.

 

 

Posted

Actually we have to assume this was a controlled stunt otherwise it would simply be illegal, but not necessarily unsafe. I don't see any problem with it ... Straight and level ... high speed ... CavOK ... precision flying .... what's the issue?

 

 

  • Agree 9
Posted

Errr, what was wrong with it? And remember the first Lear jet was designed as a poor airforce fighter .

 

 

Posted

I believe there was once a pilot who was pursued by a Regulator after rumours circulated that he had flown under a bridge. They dropped it after they realised the width of the span was less than the wingspan of the aircraft concerned.

 

The bridge was apparently a lot higher than it was wide!

 

Kaz

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

i remember living in a country where an adrenalin rush was still legal. i cant believe those saying it was stupid... crazy, yes, an massive rush, hell yes. its nothing military pilots dont do as part of their training... and still do as part of exercises..

 

Im just happy there are still countries around where you decide your level of risk tolerance, and not the legal society like it does here..

 

awesome video...

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
I believe there was once a pilot who was pursued by a Regulator after rumours circulated that he had flown under a bridge. They dropped it after they realised the width of the span was less than the wingspan of the aircraft concerned.The bridge was apparently a lot higher than it was wide!

 

Kaz

Yes Kaz. but the hilarious part is he did fly under it. It was alleged he kicked rudder and skidded through, just gave him enough clearance ... LOL

 

 

Posted

I was aiming my comment more towards the fact that the guys holding up the wire were on very unstable platforms and if they moved, the pilot could be held responsible. Still, he chose to do it and I think that's damned irresponsible.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...