Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You don't want to legislate against stuff. It becomes too restrictive. Better education, training and advertising of this sort of stuff is a better way of doing it.

 

Mind you I can't believe someone would be that stupid. I can understand lapses in judgement but this is a whole other level.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

No ... you cannot legislate against stupidity, it is a human virtue. But that doesn't stop us from trying ... and the consequences are, we all suffer from stupid legislation.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 4
Posted

What I've been trying to get across for several years, with apparently very little success is that AustralianGovernments came to this conclusion in the mid 1980's.

 

They would appoint Health Inspectors who would go around inspecting restaurants, be given cups of coffee and escorted around the dirty parts, sign an approval certificate and next week someone would get food poisoning, and the inspector would get the blame.

 

Today no new legislation is required for "selfies" or the next fad, the victims just sue the stupid. Easy.

 

Gradually the stupid get training, get the message and the situation improves. It doesn't matter if they make a habit of breaking the rules;when something goes wrong there they are in the spotlight with no one else to blame but themselves.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

""A GoPro camera mounted to the plane's windshield recorded Singh and several other passengers taking selfies""

 

Ahh, I am training now in a Cessna 150 and i dont know how you could get "Several Other Passengers taking selfies"

 

Great reporting, again.

 

 

Posted
Ahh, I am training now in a Cessna 150 and i dont know how you could get "Several Other Passengers taking selfies"

Multiple flights.

 

According to the report I read, there wasn't even direct evidence of taking selfies on the accident flight, but it was concluded that it was the likely cause due to selfies on multiple previous flights.

 

 

Posted

So his not being rated for night or instrument flying can be discounted as an issue?

 

 

Posted

Hang on!

 

Ok, the "go pro" camera survived. They got sound and video (looking out the window I would hope.)

 

How the &^*&^* can they say they "heard" people taking selfies?

 

What is to say they weren't taking pictures out the window?

 

However: Doing that at MIDNIGHT does seem a bit silly.

 

 

Posted

well if he wasnt endorsed to instrument fly at night or take passengers etc ,wouldnt that be mistake number 1 ? just askin

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
""A GoPro camera mounted to the plane's windshield recorded Singh and several other passengers taking selfies""Ahh, I am training now in a Cessna 150 and i dont know how you could get "Several Other Passengers taking selfies"

 

Great reporting, again.

If you read it properly you will see they did more than one flight.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Granted he did more than one flight.

 

But all data from previous flights and what passengers did (or didn't do) is kinda null and void.

 

The only data which is of importance is that of the last flight.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

I only mentioned the multiple flights in response to someone's post about more than one pax in a C150. My guess is this person is one of those type that will eliminate themselves what ever happens, the Darwin Theory at work.

 

 

Posted

Teck,

 

I didn't mean to sound like I was having a go at you.

 

I was only stating the error with how the "CVR" 007_rofl.gif.8af89c0b42f3963e93a968664723a160.gif (Camera) was misquoted in what information it was giving, etc.

 

 

Posted

You can see from the twists and turns of this thread why governments are getting out of prescribing offences and penalties and leaving it up to those involved to sort it out financially.

 

 

Posted
Teck,I didn't mean to sound like I was having a go at you.

 

I was only stating the error with how the "CVR" 007_rofl.gif.8af89c0b42f3963e93a968664723a160.gif (Camera) was misquoted in what information it was giving, etc.

No problem.

 

 

Posted
No ... you cannot legislate against stupidity, it is a human virtue. But that doesn't stop us from trying ... and the consequences are, we all suffer from stupid legislation.

And by protecting idiots from themselves you end up with more of them and they breed and vote.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Agree 4
  • Winner 2
Posted
And by protecting idiots from themselves you end up with more of them and they breed and vote.

Damn right with that one Richard.

 

 

Posted

Go on. They wouldn't know what causes babies and as well as voting. why would they be so clever ? Nev

 

 

  • Caution 2
Posted

Lol. Every time a new Government gets elected, approximately 49% of the voters say the other 51% are idiots. Repeat every election cycle.

 

 

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...