It's what year?

[dazza 38]

Nothing Illegal about seeking asylum. We signed onto the International Convention for refugees. Through the United Nations- which was actually started by a Australian, Doc Evatt.And one of the small boats they were forced onto, was not seaworthy. It broke down before reaching Indonesia's shore.

 

No that was under the previous government, this government would prefer to use military force. And at the same time really anger our biggest neighbour.

Who gives a $hit about the Indo's, they are nothing more than corrupt monkeys.

 

 

[Happyflyer]

Nothing Illegal about seeking asylum. We signed onto the International Convention for refugees. Through the United Nations- which was actually started by a Australian, Doc Evatt.And one of the small boats they were forced onto, was not seaworthy. It broke down before reaching Indonesia's shore.

No that was under the previous government, this government would prefer to use military force. And at the same time really anger our biggest neighbour.

Nothing illegal about seeking asylum - true. Leaving Indonesia without going thru the proper channel is illegal. If they do get to Australia by boat it would also be an illegal entry.

 

United Nations Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, to which Australia is a signatory, defines "illegal entry" as "crossing borders without complying with the necessary requirements for legal entry into the receiving State".[7]

 

 

[Litespeed]

Who gives a $hit about the Indo's, they are nothing more than corrupt monkeys.

Ouch

 

That sounds more than a little bit racist.

 

Corruption is another matter. Given we had a government and wheat board that actually paid large bribes to Iraq whilst we were at War, we are world class at corruption.

 

Nothing illegal about seeking asylum - true. Leaving Indonesia without going thru the proper channel is illegal. If they do get to Australia by boat it would also be an illegal entry.United Nations Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, to which Australia is a signatory, defines "illegal entry" as "crossing borders without complying with the necessary requirements for legal entry into the receiving State".[7]

This is negated when seeking Asylum under the UN protocols.

 

 

[Happyflyer]

OuchThat sounds more than a little bit racist.

 

Corruption is another matter. Given we had a government and wheat board that actually paid large bribes to Iraq whilst we were at War, we are world class at corruption.

 

This is negated when seeking Asylum under the UN protocols.

No it's not, they are entering the country illegally.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-06/morrison-correct-illegal-entry-people/4935372

 

 

[Marty_d]

No it's not, they are entering the country illegally.http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-06/morrison-correct-illegal-entry-people/4935372

From that Fact Check reference:

 

"The description of foreigners previously as illegal and currently as unlawful in the Migration Act does not mean they have broken the law."

 

and

 

"Mr Morrison can rely upon the definition of "illegal entry" in the people smuggling protocol, which Australia signed and ratified, so long as he makes it clear that he is doing so.

 

However, experts warn that the use of the terms "illegal" and "unlawful" in this context is potentially misleading, as they are words usually applied to criminal acts."

 

 

[Happyflyer]

From that Fact Check reference:"The description of foreigners previously as illegal and currently as unlawful in the Migration Act does not mean they have broken the law."

and

 

"Mr Morrison can rely upon the definition of "illegal entry" in the people smuggling protocol, which Australia signed and ratified, so long as he makes it clear that he is doing so.

 

However, experts warn that the use of the terms "illegal" and "unlawful" in this context is potentially misleading, as they are words usually applied to criminal acts."

Fortunately we have had no more illegal entries since the present government did what they were elected to do, stop the boats. Happily no more deaths have occurred at sea lately.

 

 

[Litespeed]

Fortunately we have had no more illegal entries since the present government did what they were elected to do, stop the boats. Happily no more deaths have occurred at sea lately.

No.

 

We are never told what actually happens as it is a "on water matter" and they have still arrived but then been taken to off shore processing centres such as Naru.

 

IF any boats have sunk on way or after been forced back- we will never know about, To say anything other than this is wishful thinking or arrogance on the scale of a MAD MONK.

 

 

[dazza 38]

OuchThat sounds more than a little bit racist.

 

Corruption is another matter. Given we had a government and wheat board that actually paid large bribes to Iraq whilst we were at War, we are world class at corruption.

 

This is negated when seeking Asylum under the UN protocols.

It probably sounds racist because I am racist.