Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, kasper said:

Not only 10.  Over 20 of them.  The 10 was the modified ju87 with jettisoning fixed gear.

 

to help - 26 in total built. 
 

next clue tomorrow 
 

Can only find the Edgley Optica but 23 of them built apparently. No idea about jettisonable undercarriage though!

 

Posted

Thinks... must have been a fixed gear aircraft that was expected to spend a lot of time over water. Post war, so slow heavy lifter?  Hmmm

Posted

Explains why it confounded us for so long.  You wouldn't particularly want a short anything if the normal one was available. Nev

  • Agree 1
Posted

But you'd have to walk miles to find something more ungainly.

Posted (edited)

Well done.  Yes. The short seamew.  A plane design hit repeatedly with the ugly stick and then given half the power it needed.   Whack a double mamba in the front and I think it would have had half a chance in its role

Edited by kasper
Posted

What is more annoying is that there is another post on here about the Seamew and Airtruk!!! Yet nobody picked it before pmccarthy! Well done that man.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Supposed to be capable of 18 hours endurance but at 75mph and took an hour to climb to 10,000 feet. Designed to defend England from Zeppelins, it was a failure.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Another one without a photo.

 

What helicopter had two angled tail rotors?

Posted

The desccription of the Apache's tail rotor I have seen is simply a 4 blade tail rotor. Although the two pairs of blades are not at right angles, they appear to be to one unit and do not counter-rotate. The machine in question has separate tail rotors at the end of two Vee shaped booms.

 

1431918014_Veerotors.JPG.d574caab05e5404b911a5ca20838f8b1.JPG

 

I believe the odd spacing of the Apache's tail rotor reduces noise, similar to the odd blade spacing on some fenestrons.

Posted

This is a photo of the S-56. It looks nothing like the image above. This aircraft is from around the same era, but is European. It was later modified to a conventional single tail rotor.

 

S-56.jpg.b85a46d8c7cf666bff55b00cc3b5be23.jpg

Posted

The caption on this photo says it was an early experimental version of the S-56 but the caption may be wrong. I will keep looking. 🙂

C4174858-7447-49CD-B413-7E8EF0607DD6.jpeg

Posted

Let's put this to rest. The machine I came across was a SNCASE SE-3110 or Sud-Est SE-3110,

a French two seat experimental helicopter with unusual twin, angled tail rotors, first flown in 1950. After brief tests SNCASE decided to concentrate on a closely related but single-tail-rotor design.

 

se3110-7.jpg.0c88deabc1cde929e306909b0583139b.jpg

 

 

Posted

Yep. The way to spot the difference from the Bf-109 is the higher placement of the exhausts, like the Spitfire. Bf-109 exhausts are below the propeller drive shaft.

Posted

Can’t remember it’s name but I read about it years ago.  It’s an American one off experimental built to be a flying caravan/home for a retired guy and his wife.  But it was under powered when complete and he was losing interest in it.  Was somewhere down south in the USA - can’t recall if it was Florida or Georgia. .  

Posted

Yes. Wilson Global Explorer. Sleeping accommodation for 7 persons. Was retired after flying from Australia to France in 1998. A smaller, single engine version, Global Explorer 2 was also built.

 

 

1053572824_GlobalExplorerII.thumb.JPG.d0a2a2853e75995e85c25e15661b7cf3.JPG

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...