Pearo Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 From NASA Report CR-1975, Riding and Handling Qualities of Light Aircraft:"The change in rolling moment due to variation in yawing velocity ... wing provides the major contribution ... left wing moves faster than the right wing, producing more lift ... consequently ... rolling moment ..." whereas "the change in rolling moment .. caused by variation in sideslip angle ... is the result of wing dihedral effect and the moment resulting from the vertical tail center of pressure located above the equilibrium x-axis ..." Apply rudder and you get both a yawing velocity and a sideslip (or skid). The report quantifies each effect for a Cessna 182 as an example. Link pls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djpacro Posted February 14, 2016 Author Share Posted February 14, 2016 Link to my hard drive? Try the NASA Technical Report server or Cranfield University library - both free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearo Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 Link to my hard drive? Try the NASA Technical Report server or Cranfield University library - both free. Neither seem to provide the paper you cited, or at least its not obvious from the searches I performed. Perhaps you could drop box it for those of us who are not privy to the report Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearo Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 Ok, so it seems said report is actually a book. I found a digitised copy online, that is pretty hard to read. a PDF would be better. Trying to see the link to a Cessna 182 data. To me all I can see now is a table that shows the effect of yaw in increased wing speed as a result of wing geometry. As I suggest earlier, this is going to be negligible in most GA type aircraft and that reports suggest its wise to design a wing to reduce that effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted February 15, 2016 Share Posted February 15, 2016 If you are doing say 120 knots and you yaw the plane the SPEED increment with one wing related to the other, and lift variation, is a pretty small % . I would say the largest effect is due to aircraft design, particularly relating to dihedral , one wing is shielded by the fuselage and most of all sweep back, which can cause some very interesting effects. A tail of large size and mostly above fuselage axis would have a discernible effect too with rudder application, but in the opposite sense. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djpacro Posted February 15, 2016 Author Share Posted February 15, 2016 Perhaps you could drop box it for those of us who are not privy to the report Seems to have fallen off the NTRS. Here you are https://www.dropbox.com/s/orfmqo5847nfnh0/NASACR1975.pdf?dl=0 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearo Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 Seems to have fallen off the NTRS. Here you are https://www.dropbox.com/s/orfmqo5847nfnh0/NASACR1975.pdf?dl=0 Thats a solid read. I did fluid mechanics at uni and I am struggling through that big time. For a laugh, I tried solving some of the equations, I failed. The young fella that works for us did a double degree in math, so next time things are quiet I am going to put him to the test. I dare say that paper is aimed at post grad aero mech people! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djpacro Posted February 18, 2016 Author Share Posted February 18, 2016 Thats a solid read. .... I dare say that paper is aimed at post grad aero mech people! Yep, it is a good but basic summary of stuff. I used to have that Fortran program on my computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pearo Posted February 18, 2016 Share Posted February 18, 2016 If you are doing say 120 knots and you yaw the plane the SPEED increment with one wing related to the other, and lift variation, is a pretty small % . I would say the largest effect is due to aircraft design, particularly relating to dihedral , one wing is shielded by the fuselage and most of all sweep back, which can cause some very interesting effects. A tail of large size and mostly above fuselage axis would have a discernible effect too with rudder application, but in the opposite sense. Nev This is correct. The paper (book) that DJP supplied looks at making rides in small aircraft more user friendly. When you refer to rolling moment as a result of yaw (Clr), the author suggests it should me minismised to prevent spin entry. They dont give figures of lift derived from yaw, but they they do provide some data based on wing design. They also provide some detail on the tail contributing to roll. At the end of the day, unless you really jump hard on the rudder at speed, there is going to be very little lift as a result of the difference in wing speeds. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
facthunter Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 YES. It only happens AS you are yawing. Once you reach a steady state the effect is gone. As in a (continuous slip/ skid or sideslipping on purpose.. While a sideslip is totally crossed controls, often with full rudder, you won't spin if the minimum safe airspeed is maintained OR you don't pull the stick back. (same thing). It's pretty uncomfortable awkward manoeuver, but executed well won't cause a spin. Errors are not being slow enough and not keeping the wing down. The aim is a high rate of descent at the slowest, safe speed, giving a steep approach angle. Nev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now