mcrowley Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 What is the firewall width comparison of the Savannah S, CH701 and the CH750? I'm wondering if the cowling options are similar. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rotax618 Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 From my measurements the 701 and Savannah VG have the same firewall, the Savannah XL and S have the same width firewall but at about 6deg less rake. I have no knowledge of the 750. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eightyknots Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 From my measurements the 701 and Savannah VG have the same firewall, the Savannah XL and S have the same width firewall but at about 6deg less rake. I have no knowledge of the 750. Even though the width is the same, it seems that Zenith 701/750/Savannah VG and Savannah XL/S are not going to be interchangeable? The reason why I am asking this is that I am still considering fitting a Viking 130 to the Savannah I want to build. The problem is that the Viking mob only sell Zenith 750 firewall forward kits (well, also SeaRey, etc but that's another story). The engine would come point forward at the wrong angle presumably? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rankamateur Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 The engine would come point forward at the wrong angle presumably? Got an angle grinder and a welder? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcrowley Posted April 27, 2017 Author Share Posted April 27, 2017 I'm installing a Corvair engine and I can tell you that the Corvair motor mount for the CH750 does not fit the Savannah S. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eightyknots Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 I'm installing a Corvair engine and I can tell you that the Corvair motor mount for the CH750 does not fit the Savannah S. In which way is it different? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllanBendigo Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 I will get you the to firewall sizes today and post here The 750 is much larger than the 701 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan CH650CH750 Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 I will get you the to firewall sizes today and post hereThe 750 is much larger than the 701 See firewall drawings for 750 and 701 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eightyknots Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 See firewall drawings for 750 and 701 That's really useful. All we need now is a Savannah S/XL firewall drawing for a full comparison. Does anyone have such a drawing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcrowley Posted May 2, 2017 Author Share Posted May 2, 2017 My Savannah S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllanBendigo Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 My Savannah S Sav. 711 mm. 616 mm 701. 730mm 610 mm 750. 898mm. 690 mm Cheers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eightyknots Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 Sav. 711 mm. 616 mm 701. 730mm 610 mm 750. 898mm. 690 mm Cheers This is a handy way to compare the fire wall sizes. Thank you. Looks can deceive because if you would have asked me I would have given my opinion that the CH701 was the narrowest. I am surprised to see that the Savannah actually has the narrowest fire wall! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rotax618 Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 Which Savannah model did you get that dimension from? I used a CH701 2 stroke engine mount on my Classic Savannah and the bolt holes lined up perfectly, I compared the Savannah firewall with the early 701 drawings and found it to be almost identical. I later tried to fit an XL engine frame but found the angle of firewall to be different, about 6deg less, so the bolt holes were just a bit off centre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcrowley Posted May 4, 2017 Author Share Posted May 4, 2017 Which Savannah model did you get that dimension from? I used a CH701 2 stroke engine mount on my Classic Savannah and the bolt holes lined up perfectly, I compared the Savannah firewall with the early 701 drawings and found it to be almost identical.I later tried to fit an XL engine frame but found the angle of firewall to be different, about 6deg less, so the bolt holes were just a bit off centre. My post was from the drawing in my construction manual for the Savannah S, the penciled numbers are from measurements I took myself. In fact, here are a few more measurements, including the degree of "tilt" I took in order have a custom mount designed and fabricated for my Corvair engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rotax618 Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 I ultimately had to build a engine frame to fit the Rotax ring mount to the VG Savannah, but the engine mount bolt hole centres on the original 701 and Classic/VG Savannah are identical, both aircraft were designed by the same people. And one is a knockoff of the other. The XL/S Savannahs seem to suffer more nosewheel cracking-damage etc because of the less caster which increases steering/landing loads, it seems the firewall was made more vertical to increase the windscreen rake and make it look faster. As they say an aeroplane is a million compromises all flying in formation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now