Birdseye Posted December 18, 2017 Posted December 18, 2017 how does anyone get into that? You have to kow-tow low to get in. 1
Hawkeye Posted December 18, 2017 Posted December 18, 2017 Bex Are the wings going to fold, with the cantilever design? cheers john
bexrbetter Posted December 18, 2017 Author Posted December 18, 2017 You have to kow-tow low to get in. I laffed, but one complaint from many flyers is access so I am aiming to be one of the easiest ..
bexrbetter Posted December 18, 2017 Author Posted December 18, 2017 BexAre the wings going to fold, with the cantilever design? cheers john At the moment they are just drawn up as easy remove, but one of the major complaints these days is cost of storage, so I think a manufacturer is crazy to not offer a "One man, fold'n'trailer" option, so will be working towards that goal. 1
kasper Posted December 18, 2017 Posted December 18, 2017 I do like the little head you use in your 3D renders ... though he looks a bit manic/evil 1
bexrbetter Posted December 18, 2017 Author Posted December 18, 2017 I do like the little head you use in your 3D renders ... though he looks a bit manic/evil We all like a little head Kasper, I call him The Crazy Frenchman!
kasper Posted December 18, 2017 Posted December 18, 2017 We all like a little head Kasper, I call him The Crazy Frenchman! Ah the mad Frenchman - well Bex Mk3 will have to be a mignet formula. . I’ll volunteer for test pilot on it - it’ll be no.6 or 7 of the Pou derived in my log and third for full test program.
bexrbetter Posted December 18, 2017 Author Posted December 18, 2017 Ah the mad Frenchman - well Bex Mk3 will have to be a mignet formula. . I’ll volunteer for test pilot on it - it’ll be no.6 or 7 of the Pou derived in my log and third for full test program. Oh yeah, I have a Poo all ready to be squeezed out. I feel I have an answer to the crosswind issue, while retaining the simplicity that is the Mignet formula. But enough on my plate for the immediate moment.
kasper Posted December 18, 2017 Posted December 18, 2017 Oh yeah, I have a Poo all ready to be squeezed out.I feel I have an answer to the crosswind issue, while retaining the simplicity that is the Mignet formula. But enough on my plate for the immediate moment. PLEASE do not even think about what Pierre did on the HM1100 courduan. Do not put ailerons on the rear wing. I’m begging you do not do it.
bexrbetter Posted December 18, 2017 Author Posted December 18, 2017 PLEASE do not even think about what Pierre did on the HM1100 courduan. Do not put ailerons on the rear wing. I’m begging you do not do it. I did say "Mignet formula", i.e. 2 axis, front wing for elevation and rudder for roll. I believe I can avoid cosandey flaps too. By the way, Henri himself didn't have a problem with ailerons, he just though they were a complication and a waste of time.
fly_tornado Posted December 18, 2017 Posted December 18, 2017 I do like the little head you use in your 3D renders ... though he looks a bit manic/evil And the Douglas Bader like legs
Birdseye Posted December 18, 2017 Posted December 18, 2017 And the Douglas Bader like legs Hopefully without the same ego!
Litespeed Posted December 18, 2017 Posted December 18, 2017 The ego is not his biggest problem, the madman fails to realize he has no spine.
Bruce Tuncks Posted December 18, 2017 Posted December 18, 2017 I find rudder-elevator-dihedral models to be easier to thermal than rudder-elevator-aileron-bugger-all-dihedral models. With the latter, I can't control the speed in the thermal turn. ( other people obviously do better than me). With one model, a hobbyking phoenix, I actually modified the wing to give it a lot of dihedral. The result was that the ailerons became so ineffective they might as well not have been there. This model now turned with the rudder. So my favourite models for flying in thermals are the old free-flight Playboy and Dixielander types, with radio on the motor, rudder and elevator. But surely a full-size is different, especially when it comes to landing, where I would not like to be without ailerons.
kasper Posted December 19, 2017 Posted December 19, 2017 I find rudder-elevator-dihedral models to be easier to thermal than rudder-elevator-aileron-bugger-all-dihedral models.With the latter, I can't control the speed in the thermal turn. ( other people obviously do better than me). With one model, a hobbyking phoenix, I actually modified the wing to give it a lot of dihedral. The result was that the ailerons became so ineffective they might as well not have been there. This model now turned with the rudder. So my favourite models for flying in thermals are the old free-flight Playboy and Dixielander types, with radio on the motor, rudder and elevator. But surely a full-size is different, especially when it comes to landing, where I would not like to be without ailerons. You never notice you don’t have ailerons on a mignet formula aircraft unless you need to hold a slip in landing crosswind. But in reality most of the single seater Pou’s land touchdown to full stop without brakes in under 100m so even with a 10-15m wide strip angled landings Work in most winds you’d like to be flying in. And if you fit differential spoilers on the front wing you can dial in wing down and land normally. 1 1
Pilot Pete Posted December 19, 2017 Posted December 19, 2017 How off topic can you get? Poo?? Poo??? This sort of thread drift just gives me the shxts
bexrbetter Posted December 19, 2017 Author Posted December 19, 2017 How off topic can you get?Poo?? Poo??? We are talking about the Frenchman Henri Mignet's "Pou du ciel", meaning louse of the sky, known commonly in English as the "Flying Flea". The pronunciation for "Pou" is poo. Not off topic because I mentioned previously that I want to do a Pou, it's been building up for a while now. I'd better grab some paper and a pencil to work it out. 2
Pilot Pete Posted December 19, 2017 Posted December 19, 2017 Well aware of the context of your post and was just trying to take the mickey out of you. But seriously, are you looking at a "flying flea " design using the same/similar components as your gull wing and high wing kits? 1
bexrbetter Posted December 19, 2017 Author Posted December 19, 2017 But seriously, are you looking at a "flying flea " design using the same/similar components as your gull wing and high wing kits? Would love to, got to get these first 2 out of the way first. Self control is a difficult thing, but lots of fun to get excited about possibilities, never stop dreaming! 2
bexrbetter Posted January 4, 2018 Author Posted January 4, 2018 Well it's been a strange and sometimes sad 4 or so months, now time to get back into the plane proper. I have decided in selfishness to spend a day a week also on getting my sports car up to scratch for production. Difference now is because I have such a lovely process in place with the aluminium, I will be shooting for predominately aluminium bodywork unlike the fiberglass shown here. The Lotus 7 was originally all aluminium bodywork. Mine is vaguely in the form of a Lotus 7, but much bigger, designed for larger American and Australian gentlemen, and the appropriate torsional rigidity for V6 and V8 power units (about 8000lbs per inch). I started last week on a new updated chassis for it .. An original Lotus 7 .. 5
Marty_d Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Well it's been a strange and sometimes sad 4 or so months, now time to get back into the plane proper.I have decided in selfishness to spend a day a week also on getting my sports car up to scratch for production. Difference now is because I have such a lovely process in place with the aluminium, I will be shooting for predominately aluminium bodywork unlike the fiberglass shown here. The Lotus 7 was originally all aluminium bodywork. Mine is vaguely in the form of a Lotus 7, but much bigger, designed for larger American and Australian gentlemen, and the appropriate torsional rigidity for V6 and V8 power units (about 8000lbs per inch). I started last week on a new updated chassis for it .. [ATTACH=full]53304[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]53305[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]53308[/ATTACH] An original Lotus 7 .. [ATTACH=full]53307[/ATTACH] So finally you need to design a trailer for your aircraft - then you can offer package deals! 2
Bryon Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Can we concentrate on the plane please....... I am a big Aussie gentleman (the missus says there is no such animal....just thick blokes) and require at least a 45" wide fuselage at the cockpit I am interested in your design as I like the morgan sierra, but am interested in the evolution of the basic design as a build project for my retirement 2
bexrbetter Posted January 21, 2018 Author Posted January 21, 2018 Well so far a number of things have gone right this year, including a new Grandson, and important to you guys, another business project I have been involved in has started to come good which means I have some cash freed up and time to get back into the plane. 6 1
Marty_d Posted January 21, 2018 Posted January 21, 2018 Well so far a number of things have gone right this year, including a new Grandson, and important to you guys, another business project I have been involved in has started to come good which means I have some cash freed up and time to get back into the plane. Congratulations grandpa! 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now