Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks KP, but I'm not looking at a tail dragger, just yet. I need more training. Just looking at a nose wheeler for my first aircraft.

 

 

Posted

Get someone to convert you to a T/W once you master a tail wheal you will be right for life.

 

You just have to accept that your feet will be super busy however once you are there you will be a master.

 

KP

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

FWIW even if you don't end up with a tailwheel plane make sure you do a TW endorsement. I know there are a lot of cliches about tailwheel vs nose wheel pilots but it is my opinion (I am a low hours pilot!!!) that a TW endo will do absolutely no harm and will assist in supplementing a properly trained nose wheel pilot. In my limited time and even with my low hours I have still flown with nose wheel pilots who do Not use the rudder at all!! Scary really but as I said I am low hours so my advice is certainly not expert!

 

 

  • Agree 3
Posted

Very good advice there SDQDI.

 

It surprising what you can do with busy trained feet.

 

KP

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

I sought a bit of clarification from my CFI about what constitutes a type. It is the same as GA. If you want to fly a different model of plane you need to get the type endorsement on that plane. He was saying that even though you were good to fly a Cessna C172, to fly a Cessna C150, you'd need a type endorsement done to fly a C150.

 

 

Posted
He was saying that even though you were good to fly a Cessna C172, to fly a Cessna C150, you'd need a type endorsement done to fly a C150.

Really??

 

Never heard that before, only major endorsements are such as csu/retract, tailwheel or other "design features"

 

I have never heard of that before, maybe its a schools own requirement.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Agree 2
Posted

Even if it's the same plane, merely rearranging the landing gear to gain more speed. At least the HummelBird can be either nose or Tw.

 

spacesailor

 

 

Posted
Really??Never heard that before, only major endorsements are such as csu/retract, tailwheel or other "design features"

 

I have never heard of that before, maybe its a schools own requirement.

Further to that, when it comes to twin engine aircraft I believe you need a type check for each aircraft type.

 

 

Posted
Further to that, when it comes to twin engine aircraft I believe you need a type check for each aircraft type.

Not since P61 Robbo, it's under 5700 now like the singles. With some exceptions. Which has been good.

 

 

  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1
Posted
Not since P61 Robbo, it's under 5700 now like the singles. With some exceptions. Which has been good.

Cheers Ben

 

Still gotta catch up on all the changes.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Cheers BenStill gotta catch up on all the changes.

That's a full time job, every time I think I'm up to date again, a whole bunch of new exemptions come out.....

 

 

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...