Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It looks as if this is a return to the Cessna type wing, which has drag from the wing / strut / fuselage connections, but the strut looks as if it may deliver lift.

 

Back to the biplane?

 

I wonder where they got those weights from. The wing looks to be a very high proportion of gross weight. maybe it includes the engines and fuel.

 

 

Posted

They obviously need the strut because the wing is so thin that they can't get sufficient strength with a cantilever. Thinner wing = less fuel capacity, but that's OK if you are saving fuel. I bet a lot of work went into the strut-to-wing joint. Probably not trying to get lift off the strut so much as reduce drag.

 

 

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...