Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
designed over 60 years ago, amazing; and apparently v difficult to fly.

Yes. My friend Richard Drake (who's hangar I now possess) was a U-2 pilot. I've heard a number of accounts of incidents and accidents caused by it's long wings, bicycle gear, low power, and the narrow gap between stall and excessive speed at high altitude.

 

Here's an interesting account of U-2 flying's challenges:

 

Killer at 70,000 Feet | Military Aviation | Air & Space Magazine

 

 

Posted
Hi SrPliot,thanks, that's an amazing article. Those pilots are extraordinary.

No worries. You may find the landings interesting too.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNYg2i9Jgvs

 

It may be the only plane that looks easier to land on a carrier than on terra firma.

 

 

But with difficult landings come base fields (like Beale AFB) with only one runway. Why make it easy? 063_coffee.gif.b574a6f834090bf3f27c51bb81b045cf.gif

 

AirNav: KBAB - Beale Air Force Base

 

 

Posted
Whoever designed the undercarriage had a sense of humour... (that's humor to some)

So did the guy who decided to base them at a place with no cross strips (Beale AFB). At least on an aircraft carrier you are guaranteed a good head wind every time.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...