Matt Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 Not having any experience with bang-chutes or the procedures for their operation, I'd expect the emergency procedures would be similar for bang-seats (ejection seats) where the decision to deploy the chute or seat is a reaction, not something to be done after careful thought or planning i.e. X happens, do Y, if Y fails pull Z. The benefit of hindsight and armchairs allows us to look back at deployments or ejections and question the logic of whether it should have happened or not. Unless there's someone lurking in these forums who have been in the situation where they had to make that choice (chute or seat) and willing to contribute to the discussion, all we can do is ponder "what if...".
TechMan Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 If you do get one, make sure you take the pin out before you go flying, otherwise you may aswell not get one. Chris
Yenn Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 Not very long ago there was a report of a chute deployed because the pilot feared he was going to become unconscious. The result was he lived, he did not lose consciousness, although he could not have known that outcome. The pilot ended up a paraplegic, because the plane come down in a dam and there was no cushioning from a collapsing undercarriage, it came to a sudden stop when the fuse and wings hit the water. The pilot said even though he ended up in a wheelchair, he would not change his action in hindsight.
Guest brentc Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 There was also a Cirrus parachute deployment where the guy passed out, the aircraft then descended (nobody knows how quickly) and he came around at or near VNE and decided to pull the handle because he wasn't sure if he went through VNE and structural damage 'could' have occurred when he was passed out! Sounded to me like he just wanted to pull the handle to see what happened.
Guest Flyer40 Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 Saw some data somewhere that suggested up to a 20g landing under the canopy if you hit something hard like Yenn described. It would seem that BRS equipped air frames need some thought given to seat design. It's probably only achievable on new designs, but diverting some of the vertical impact energy into a collapsing seat frame could reduce the g load to below that which spinal damage is likely. Helicopters have already been down this path with seat design so theres bound to be data already available.
Mick Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 Something many may not be aware of - These systems must be serviced periodically, generally every 7 years. At this stage they have to sent back to the manufacturer overseas. Now here's the twist, you can not air freight them because they are too dangerous to carry in an aircraft?????? ;););)
wanabigaplane Posted February 16, 2008 Posted February 16, 2008 Alternative to BRS What about putting the money into an auto-pilot instead ? Jack.:):)
Guest Bretto Posted May 19, 2008 Posted May 19, 2008 I think should be an option, let the owner decide if they want one or not Me personally i think i would have one just for the incase scenario And wana - why not have both?
Ultralights Posted May 19, 2008 Posted May 19, 2008 my opinion, it should be an opt out option, as in it will come standard, but you can option Not to have one...
prwood Posted May 20, 2008 Posted May 20, 2008 Mick, You can airfreight. I bought a BRS out from the States a few years back. The shipping was very costly as the rocket section had to be packed in a special container. The service time from memory was about 7 years & it would probably be easier to buy a new rocket rather than send the old one back for servicing & pay the freight both ways!! Regards Pete
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now