Steve L Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 This is different, it actually clears the ground for a while but my teeth would have fallen out by then. 2
onetrack Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 I just love the way the pilot has full and total control of the machine, and can therefore put it down so smoothly - and right where he wanted it! 2
Geoff_H Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 Imagine the research needed to develop a good, and safe, control system. Love the fact that someone is trying, what aviation is best at doing. 1
Head in the clouds Posted August 9, 2017 Posted August 9, 2017 I thought this one was pretty clever too - 1
facthunter Posted August 9, 2017 Posted August 9, 2017 Wonder how long the wing would last without metal fatigue? extreme cyclic loads, You'd need feathers around the tips to manoeuver. Pass thanks. Nev
Old Koreelah Posted August 9, 2017 Posted August 9, 2017 Don't be a spoilsport, Nev! Material science is still in its infancy. Who knows what lightweight, super strong, fatigue-proof stuff will be available to designers in a few short years. The real revolution will start when biochemists learn how to grow oversized, self-repairing feathers.
Steve L Posted August 9, 2017 Author Posted August 9, 2017 I think it would need a 100 hourly with extensive NDT every circuit Nev.
Head in the clouds Posted August 9, 2017 Posted August 9, 2017 I think it would need a 100 hourly with extensive NDT every circuit Nev. The one I posted was 42kg of carbon fibre, foam and balsa, no fatigue ever in any of that. Any idea of the materials in the OP one? From the amount of visible flex I'd doubt it is metal. It's easy to laugh at these attempts but there's a 'swimming' submarine I know a lot about, that emulates a shark and is more fuel efficient than a similar prop driven submersible. Still plenty of things to perfect though ...
Steve L Posted August 9, 2017 Author Posted August 9, 2017 Yea true Heads, I guess with all the effort and huge cost of a venture like this there must be a scientific gain somewhere and you gotta admire that. To me and I guess many pilots it appears not to make sense and doubt it will ever fly safely and economically. The one you posted was a bit more sensible which also appears Canadian. And your right pretty clever. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now