red750 Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 A pilot in Payson Utah took a bizjet owned by a company he had worked for and crashed it into his own home after being released for jail on domestic violence charges. His wife and son were in the house, but were unharmed. The pilot died in the crash and resulting fire. Pilot crashes plane into his own home in Utah with wife and boy inside, police say
IBob Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 What is with these self-centered guys that throw their toys out of the cot if they don't get their own way? This is kindy behaviour! 1
Thruster88 Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 That is a very strong house to keep the cessna citation out, some thing doesn't seem right.
turboplanner Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 That is a very strong house to keep the cessna citation out, some thing doesn't seem right. He hit a shed on the way in; deflection spoiled his plans.
alf jessup Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 Well at least the dead beat died and his family survived. What a pathetic person trying to take his family out. Real justice prevailed. 1
Ron5335 Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 Looking at the photos, maybe they should have built the twin towers out of natural stone. 1 1
Marty_d Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 What a loser. If he wanted to take out the house and everyone in it, he should have dived vertically through the weakest area - the roof. 1
fly_tornado Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 1995 Citation is $2M plane as well, probably leased.
alf jessup Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 What a loser. If he wanted to take out the house and everyone in it, he should have dived vertically through the weakest area - the roof. It was 2 am Marty and he was probably off his nut, did s good job getting that close and a better job of missing his family
Thruster88 Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 An ASIC card would have prevented this, or maybe not. 2 6
Keenaviator Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 I was surprised at the minimal damage caused to the house of stone. Maybe the three little pigs were onto something. 2
Jabiru7252 Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 What is with these self-centered guys that throw their toys out of the cot if they don't get their own way?This is kindy behaviour! One might ask 'What stupid laws and regulations do we enforce that can drive people to such desperate and crazy actions".
turboplanner Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 One might ask 'What stupid laws and regulations do we enforce that can drive people to such desperate and crazy actions". It happened in the US. 1
kgwilson Posted August 14, 2018 Posted August 14, 2018 One might ask 'What stupid laws and regulations do we enforce that can drive people to such desperate and crazy actions". Nothing to do with laws or regulations, just a person who had lost the plot & was off his nut. 1
nomadpete Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 Utah? Perhaps he was religious? Maybe it was an act of god to turn out this way?
M61A1 Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 Nothing to do with laws or regulations, just a person who had lost the plot & was off his nut. I'm guessing you've not had much involvement with the family law court then. 1 2 1
turboplanner Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 I'm guessing you've not had much involvement with the family law court then. No point blaming family law courts; they have the unenviable job of making a decision on children AFTER the parents have been unable to reach a conclusion themselves. I saw a man once spit the dummy when he couldn’t get the unreasonable access he wanted, and turn on the Court and say he didn’t wanted any access, he never wanted to see his son again. When the judge pointed out that he had legal rights to access he said “No, she can have him, I never want to see him again, and walked out leaving the whole room shocked. There are some scum on both sides. 1
bexrbetter Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 I'm guessing you've not had much involvement with the family law court then. not this specifically but judgements being made here when the circumstances aren't known. We had a neighbor scream out of his driveway a few years back, go around the block and crash back through his front fence, attack his missus and the police drag him away. Wasn't too happy to come home a day early from his mine shift and find his missus with 2 guys in his house, kind of ruined his surprise.
bexrbetter Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 What a loser. If he wanted to take out the house and everyone in it, he should have dived vertically through the weakest area - the roof. I'm a little concerned you seem to have good knowlege of this procedure...
farri Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 Then a while back, here in Aus. there was the AUF CFI ( name withheld ) who buzzed his estranged partner's house, in an attempt to terrorise her! he was convicted and did jail time over it! I received a couple of Emails from the guy, while he was in jail, trying to convince me he was innocent of the charges.
M61A1 Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 No point blaming family law courts; they have the unenviable job of making a decision on children AFTER the parents have been unable to reach a conclusion themselves. I saw a man once spit the dummy when he couldn’t get the unreasonable access he wanted, and turn on the Court and say he didn’t wanted any access, he never wanted to see his son again. When the judge pointed out that he had legal rights to access he said “No, she can have him, I never want to see him again, and walked out leaving the whole room shocked. There are some scum on both sides. Yes, there are scum on both sides. But, consider, we have a system that can and will take everything you own and most of what you are going to own and give it to someone based on the fact that they are female. Essentially they leave you absolutely powerless over everything but whether you live or die. Some choose to try and take others with them, often succeeding. I have spent too much of my time sitting in the back of a courtroom waiting my turn. Men routinely get screwed over while most women get the softly, softly approach and chance after chance. It is common knowledge that a lot of DV applications (during the court process) are baseless and are designed solely to manipulate the courts. Unenviable job...yes, but also very poorly done by our legal system. So yes, I believe that if we had a family court that was unbiased, fair and actually genuinely considered the best needs of the children, that there would be many more men women and children alive today. I believe that the US system is even worse. 1 3
bexrbetter Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 Men routinely get screwed over while most women get the softly, softly approach and chance after chance. . Lived in Logan City for 20 years and support this notion. Knew plenty of women who worked the system, and the Ex's to the fullest. I wouldn't guess the percentage of DVOs that are B/S, but it's a lot. and the paradox is just getting a B/S DVO sends many men into a rage and justifies the DVO. Anyone who thinks mothers think of thier kids first and wouldnt use them as pawns to scam the system, is very wrong. 1 4
turboplanner Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 Agree but the Family Courts are not involved in any of that, and that's who M61A1 was blasting.
fly_tornado Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 Men routinely get screwed over while most women get the softly, softly approach how many of your army mates have been beaten up by their women?
frank marriott Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 Then a while back, here in Aus. there was the AUF CFI ( name withheld ) who buzzed his estranged partner's house, in an attempt to terrorise her! he was convicted and did jail time over it! I received a couple of Emails from the guy, while he was in jail, trying to convince me he was innocent of the charges. Frank, The major charge resulting in the jail time in this case was “Dangerous Operation of a Vehicle” under the Qld Criminal Code. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now