Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The on-going senate inquiry into pelAir has some serious implications for all aviation, no matter what end of town.

 

The Minister, was last night asked on his response to the current senate inquiry, where there was 176 odd pages which did not give any positive space to either CASA or ATSB. The 26 reccomendations even went to a reccomendation to investigate laying charges on casa and atsb for breaches of the TSI Act [Transport Safety Investigation Act]

 

This is worth looking at : Albo is asked an aviation question

 

and start asking questions.

 

29th Aug 2013, 11:41 #7878 (permalink)

 

Up-into-the-air

 

Join Date: May 2010

 

Location: More than 300km from SY, Australia

 

Posts: 439

 

Finally Albo is asked a question on Aviation

 

Ben Sandilandlands and Prime's Chris Reason have broken the drought on real aviation questions:

 

Further information is on:

 

PelAir in Open | Assistance to the Aviation Industry

 

Let us all keep up the questions to the Minister and keep the pressure on.

 

A useful source is: #aviation and #pelair on tw-tter.com and let albo know on @albo and tell them:

 

Aviation needs your help

 

#aviation #pelair @AbbottPressHQ @warrentrussmp @Nick_Xenophon @TurnbullMalcolm @SMirabellaMP @cnegroni @CUhlmann

 

 

 

Posted

Arising from that accident. I guess it will be about CASA's oversighting of the ops of Pel Air and their fuel carrying policy. Could be one of the reasons for all the emphasis on SMS's Nev

 

 

Posted

The issue here is that casa has breached the Transport Safety Investigation Act by not giving all the information it had to the atsb. In doing that, casa failed to give [atsb] them what is known as the "Chamber's Report".

 

This report showed that casa had failed in it's duty of care in surveilling PelAir.

 

The easy person to blame was the pilot rather than the PelAir system, which was completely "off-song".

 

This is not about sms's, but in fact the failure again by casa to both adequately surveil, following approval of a deficient AOC, which casa approved anyway.

 

There is further information and a complete breakdown at: http://vocasupport.com/?page_id=571

 

 

Posted

Significant Met conditions were at play too and the responsibility of the BOM may be in question IIRC in relation to information available at the time to both ATC and the pilot.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...