Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The report in post  #1 saying the pilots were reporting engine failure. Why does it end like this? 

 

614490590_PLANEPIC.jpg.3bbd4ccda96603fbad330dbdeaccff5b.jpg

  • Agree 3
Posted

Just to be clear, it's a support plane not the one the Kids are involved with. and that area looks very suitable (obviously mown) did they lose control?  Nev

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Yes, that is very puzzling. But the wreckage appears to reflect a stall, leading to an unsurvivable high RoD in a flat spin, ending in a pancake into the ground. 

 

The pilot and co-pilot may have potentially survived - but when a full load of fuel catches fire, with stunned or unconscious victims trapped (before any rescuers can reach them), then the end result is what you see.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Why I always did glide approaches. Which in turn is how I survived a lot of engine failures (probably about 20). 

 

 

  • Like 4
Posted

I agree that it looks like a stall/spin result. And sort of happily, it wasn't the kids who went in. An EFOTO, no doubt and an attempt to turn back seems to be a logical conclusion at this time.

 

In the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa, they could not get fuel.

 

"When we eventually got it, the support aircraft started leaking fuel so they couldn't fly with us and only two people - Driaan van den Heever, the safety pilot, and I carried on," Megan said.

 

 

Posted

So many people turn back after an engine failure shortly after takeoff and crash. They are better pilots than me and would have known that lots of people die after attempting to turn back after an early engine failure. The temptation to turn back must be overwhelming, and not something that is/can be trained for. 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
So many people turn back after an engine failure shortly after takeoff and crash. They are better pilots than me and would have known that lots of people die after attempting to turn back after an early engine failure. The temptation to turn back must be overwhelming, and not something that is/can be trained for. 

 

My instructor prefaced the  EFATO lesson with, "whatever we do we are going down straight ahead whether we damage the aircraft or not!" (having already explained to me on a whiteboard the improbability of making a 180 turn plus turning to regain the centreline plus turning to line up from a max of 500' if I was lucky, but most likely half that). So as he pulled the throttle and I responded, I drilled into my subconscious to focus on a landing spot ahead, not behind. It never occurred to me to do anything else until I started reading the accident reports of people who thought they could land behind themselves.  

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...