facthunter Posted January 14 Posted January 14 Sensenich are a highly regarded prop manufacturer, I'd stick with a light weight prop and don't do sharp turns on the ground with high revs on the engine. and one wheel nearly locked. Is it fitted with good fitting cooling baffles around the cylinders and an adjustable cowl flap? Nev
Mike Gearon Posted January 14 Author Posted January 14 2 minutes ago, RFguy said: that's the thing- speed envelope... if you have plenty of power and runway, tune for top end.... no need for a CSU.... . how many ml/nm at 140k TAS ? (lph / TAS) as for the busted crank, could be anything. but one needs ot be careful of the situation of having a heavy weight at both ends of the crank. 520 manual says "Propellers with a Rotational Moment of Inertia of up to 0,8kgm² have been used with no known problems" whatever that means... The airmaster https://www.propellor.com/ap533hctf-snr67je says it's 0.5kg.m2 But ya dont know about the possible harmonic behaviour without some instrumentation attached.... I'd go with a 3 blade. and put some vibration instrumentation in xyz on the crankcase. Hey, that’s good research! I know in the RV6 I can’t use 2100 to 2300RMP and respect that completely. It’s for good reason they restrict RPM’s. So, any info such as that max .8kgm is helpful. Yes, I think the 3 blade Sensenich carbon fibre is a good option as far as balance and light weight go. Hoping we get a good run and long term reliability.
Mike Gearon Posted January 14 Author Posted January 14 1 hour ago, facthunter said: Sensenich are a highly regarded prop manufacturer, I'd stick with a light weight prop and don't do sharp turns on the ground with high revs on the engine. and one wheel nearly locked. Is it fitted with good fitting cooling baffles around the cylinders and an adjustable cowl flap? Nev We worked extra hard to cool the slow aircraft and now we suddenly have it almost cooling too well. Could need cowl flaps! I never thought about stressing the prop with sharp turns. That’s a really good point. I whiz the RV6 around and will now make sure that’s just inertia and not much prop. I’m very familiar with blade stress on moment arms and have a patent lodged last July 2024 with exactly that problem solved for small scale wind turbines. Those little turbines can still throw blades a half a km or more! I’m building the first prototype and I’ll share when it’s on the tower. 5kw with a 5 meter spread of blades. It’s not that small! 1 2
Mike Gearon Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 Nic and I fly the S21 with UL520t in the morning then build. Some beautiful flying weather lately. Build 1 UL520t is giving us some problems. Engine temps aren’t as well behaved as we first thought after getting the prop sorted and higher flying speeds. Starting to run out of options and will buy the louvers as next step. We also have black smoke and engine cutting out on take off. I’ll video next time. Observed 3 separate puffs of black smoke watching Nic on take off going home yesterday. We know we have that hesitation. Something to do with the FADEC deciding to cut ignition and we are around 2400 2450 at this stage of climb out. Will discuss with local distributor then look to support from Herman in Florida and perhaps UL engineers in Europe. My take on this is that the FADEC programmers have some parameter that is being exceeded and they cut the ignition. I do know that Nic feeds the throttle in slowly on take off roll to reduce the chances of this problem. We plan on running laptop in aircraft to assess what the turbo is doing and other things we can’t get through the G3X Build 2 Prop on last night. Nic is nearly through the avionics. We should be at engine cowl, doors, skylight, windscreen and near finish at some stage. Maybe next few months. It goes frustratingly slowly then seems to leap forward. 3
Blueadventures Posted January 21 Posted January 21 Nice Mike. What was the empty weight of Nic's and a couple of images would be nice of how it looks today. Yours is coming along nicely; they take a while just need to get over the humps when seems slow and never getting there thoughts; I'd just do some small things to keep it moving. Like the paint job and colours; even though I'm a Blue person. Cheers 2 1
Mike Gearon Posted Monday at 03:30 AM Author Posted Monday at 03:30 AM Aircraft 1 First oil change at 15 hours. We can now do the extensive test card work. Would have been today if the wild weather wasn’t a problem. We debate speed at 2650rpm 9500ft. I’m thinking 150 knots. Will report back with actual data/ video. Aircraft 2 Doors mostly done. They are just as painful as everyone says. Really should be a polycarbonate moulded piece. I guess the fact that Rans would have to make left and right tools is why it isn’t done. Getting the center where the 2 pieces meet over the door bow isn’t fun. We know of one lower panel blowing out in flight so I’ve added UHB tape under the polycarbonate where it’s specified to go on top. I’m also going Sika on top before putting on the aluminum strip. It’s not going anywhere! I’ve planned from the start to add the upper flap lever. It’s the only spot on the aircraft I’ve gone off script. The mechanism is exactly copied from Rans so nothing new going on in the ratchet mechanism. It’s proven so why mess with it? The change is just upper mount and reduced range of travel from 90 degree to 45 degree. Ready to go to laser cutter and the 3d printed console with room for iPads, maps etc, iPhone and drink bottles needs a little refining before going out. Advantages. real estate at center of seats is now fully usable. headphone jacks come from the upper cross piece. headphones have a hangar for each. 4 point harness mount points now provided. ‘’It all mounts off the seatbelt rear connect point so not an issue for seat belt security. If anything it’s just a little more forgiving in that the cross piece would bend a little in use. We do hope to never test this. 5
Blueadventures Posted Monday at 03:59 AM Posted Monday at 03:59 AM 27 minutes ago, Mike Gearon said: Aircraft 1 First oil change at 15 hours. We can now do the extensive test card work. Would have been today if the wild weather wasn’t a problem. We debate speed at 2650rpm 9500ft. I’m thinking 150 knots. Will report back with actual data/ video. Aircraft 2 Doors mostly done. They are just as painful as everyone says. Really should be a polycarbonate moulded piece. I guess the fact that Rans would have to make left and right tools is why it isn’t done. Getting the center where the 2 pieces meet over the door bow isn’t fun. We know of one lower panel blowing out in flight so I’ve added UHB tape under the polycarbonate where it’s specified to go on top. I’m also going Sika on top before putting on the aluminum strip. It’s not going anywhere! I’ve planned from the start to add the upper flap lever. It’s the only spot on the aircraft I’ve gone off script. The mechanism is exactly copied from Rans so nothing new going on in the ratchet mechanism. It’s proven so why mess with it? The change is just upper mount and reduced range of travel from 90 degree to 45 degree. Ready to go to laser cutter and the 3d printed console with room for iPads, maps etc, iPhone and drink bottles needs a little refining before going out. Advantages. real estate at center of seats is now fully usable. headphone jacks come from the upper cross piece. headphones have a hangar for each. 4 point harness mount points now provided. ‘’It all mounts off the seatbelt rear connect point so not an issue for seat belt security. If anything it’s just a little more forgiving in that the cross piece would bend a little in use. We do hope to never test this. Mike, your aware that sika needs to be protected from UV? Thats the role of the black colour on glass etc; it's to shade the UV not for looks in the first instance. 1 1
Mike Gearon Posted Monday at 06:41 AM Author Posted Monday at 06:41 AM 2 hours ago, Blueadventures said: Mike, your aware that sika needs to be protected from UV? Thats the role of the black colour on glass etc; it's to shade the UV not for looks in the first instance. I prob should have added detail pics and the Sika product. 295UV. I’ve worked with polycarbonate as a mass production manufacturer so very aware of its tempremental nature and the 295 won’t cause crazing/ cracking. Also, there is an aluminum cover plate over the 2 door polycarbonate panels that meet. I’m adding the sika 295UV underneath to both bond and waterproof. . It’s suitable for polycarbonate without crazing. It’s UV resistant. But… in this case it’s also covered by the aluminum strip. 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now