danny_galaga Posted November 10, 2023 Posted November 10, 2023 https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/citing-valve-damage-und-drops-unleaded-fuel-and-returns-to-100ll/ 1
RFguy Posted November 10, 2023 Posted November 10, 2023 (edited) article .. I guess when they mean 'dry tappet' they mean they remove and bleed the hydraulic lifters right down. Since it's not like a solid lifter engine. Thruster ????? could just be they ran the engines hot ? or ran high CHTs ? I wonder. will be interested to see if Lycoming releases the numbers, since the Lycoming factory guidance is different to this results UL94 is a bit different to the proposed GAMI100 unleaded. (Lycomign O-360) I run 100LL for TO, climb and landing (left wing) , and Premium98 (right wing) for other (cruise) ops at 70% of max HP. Edited November 10, 2023 by RFguy 1 2
Thruster88 Posted November 10, 2023 Posted November 10, 2023 Yes dry tappet means remove tappet, disassemble and clean with solvent. Normally only done when installing new or overhauled cylinder on to engine. Lycoming dry tappet clearance 0.028 to 0.08 thou. The worry (for rotax 912 people) is how the air gets out of the tappet/ hydraulic lifter when the engine starts. 🤔😂 2
danny_galaga Posted November 10, 2023 Author Posted November 10, 2023 1 hour ago, RFguy said: article .. I guess when they mean 'dry tappet' they mean they remove and bleed the hydraulic lifters right down. Since it's not like a solid lifter engine. Thruster ????? could just be they ran the engines hot ? or ran high CHTs ? I wonder. will be interested to see if Lycoming releases the numbers, since the Lycoming factory guidance is different to this results UL94 is a bit different to the proposed GAMI100 unleaded. (Lycomign O-360) I run 100LL for TO, climb and landing (left wing) , and Premium98 (right wing) for other (cruise) ops at 70% of max HP. Interesting idea with the two different fuels RF. I never would have thought of it.
facthunter Posted November 10, 2023 Posted November 10, 2023 In principle, I don't like hydraulic lifters on an aeroengine. When you check them manually you get to know if there's something amiss. It also nearly killed me causing the only engine failure I've had on any GA "little" motor. A Continental 0-300. in a C-172. Nev 2
facthunter Posted November 10, 2023 Posted November 10, 2023 Reading the comments related to that fuel matter gives you an insight as to how little people really know about Valve seating, guide wear etc. When a cylinder head heats up the heating is very uneven around the exhaust port and the valve and seat will inevitably distort and seat less well than it did when cold. Arranging the valve spring to have special washers under it would cause them to rotate slowly and even out the wear on the valve at least. Better head cooling can reduce distortion there. Side valves are notorious for this because of the positioning of the exhaust port close to about 1/3rd of the cylinder. Nev 1
onetrack Posted November 10, 2023 Posted November 10, 2023 I don't understand why a valve seat recession protection additive wasn't used by the flight school. MMT (Methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl) is a Manganese-based fuel additive that provides excellent protection against valve seat recession - and it boosts the octane rating of the fuel by 2 or 3 numbers at the same time. In addition, MMT has been in use in Canada for over 40 years, with no detrimental health or environmental effects. Manganese is a naturally occurring element in Nature and is needed in trace levels by plant life to improve nutrient uptake. In the U.S., Millers VSP additive is readily available, and I'm sure a big flight school could have acquired the product at a discounted price for bulk purchases. 1
facthunter Posted November 10, 2023 Posted November 10, 2023 Some of any additive is always going to end up in the oil. Some anti scuffing additives have caused stuck exhaust valves on hot running aircooled motors. Nev
onetrack Posted November 11, 2023 Posted November 11, 2023 That may be the case with some "alternative" dubious additives, but MMT has an excellent track record as a fuel additive over a generation or more, enough time to find any problems. The car manufacturers wouldn't approve additives simply because they claimed they'd damage catalytic converters. No CC, no problem.
facthunter Posted November 11, 2023 Posted November 11, 2023 There are lot's of additives in modern oils. As you say, some of the older ones are not permitted anymore. These days it's difficult to get an oil for a mini and a lot of cars with non roller cam followers. Nev 1
RFguy Posted November 11, 2023 Posted November 11, 2023 valve seat recession : I'm sure there is more to this story..... Seems valve recession had coincidence with use of UL94. But that's all we have right now, the controls on their 'experiment ' are NOT tight enough to deduce causality. IE that UL94 caused the recession. Danny- dual fuel- yeah when available it's how I roll...(it does have a MOGAS STC). There is no detectable change in EGT, CHT, RPM when switching between fuels at ANY power level.... A change in the burn rate would show up as EGT change... 1 1
facthunter Posted November 11, 2023 Posted November 11, 2023 Right . the burn rate with change of octane doesn't change enough to be at all relevant. Rich or lean will alter burn rate and effective OCTANE figure. IF you detonate, your temps will go up. More likely if you are lean. Nev 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now