Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, facthunter said:

SANDING and Painting?.  Nev

Might have been sanding with sand blasters.  Who knows - as a static display the paintwork's not going to be going anywhere at mach 2.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, 440032 said:

Where's Sully?

I did think of calling the thread "Another passenger jet in the Hudson!" but thought that may be in poor taste.

Edited by Marty_d
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

Ironic! The septic tanks, pretty much did all they could to shoot down Concorde, short of actually firing a missile and now they have one on display - such is life & politics

Edited by skippydiesel
  • Agree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Marty_d said:

I did think of calling the thread "Another passenger jet in the Hudson!" but thought that may be in poor taste.

Not poor taste at all. That's funny and clever. You should get the title changed to that ☺️

  • Like 1
Posted

Boeings SST design failed. Concorde used old technology to the fullest. Boeings complex metallurgy failed to meet expectations. Nev

Posted

Along with a wheel falling off and a sudden loss of altitude with 100 passengers on the ceiling.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...