red750 Posted March 26 Posted March 26 World's largest aircraft delivers colossal cargo to makeshift airstrips NEWATLAS.COM The 108-m (356-ft) long Radia Windrunner is designed to transport cargo too big for the road, to short, semi-prepared airstrips on rough terrain. It would dwarf the majestic 84-m (275-ft) long Antonov... 1
Marty_d Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Bit misleading - "delivers" implies that it is currently delivering, whereas "in the concept stage and may be flying in 5 years" should be described as "may deliver". 1 1
facthunter Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Depends on how much new tech is in it. The Guppy's Airbus used to move big Bits of Plane around IN didn't require much development. Nev 1 1
red750 Posted March 26 Author Posted March 26 I edited the title - I had posted part of the article in the heading in error.. 1
Area-51 Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Is it electric? Looks battery powered... has a sun emblem on the side; so must be solar powered... 1
Marty_d Posted March 27 Posted March 27 17 hours ago, facthunter said: Depends on how much new tech is in it. The Guppy's Airbus used to move big Bits of Plane around IN didn't require much development. Nev The Airbus Beluga was based on an existing A300. This looks like a completely new aircraft (there's certainly nothing in the world like it now) so you'd think there'd be a large amount of development work.
facthunter Posted March 27 Posted March 27 (edited) The Concord used old tech. It flew OK despite the Yanks trying to shoot it down at every opportunity.. The Boeing SST metallurgy didn't pass muster . Didn't go into production. What a plane actually looks like especially with subsonic ones doesn't mean a lot. Nev Edited March 27 by facthunter
turboplanner Posted March 27 Posted March 27 This is not intended to fly supersonic, just beat the need for 20 man armies to meet road transport requirements, taking down power lines, putting them up again, just for one blade I know the payoad is ultralight but to me it doesn't look to have enough wing area. However, it seems it's biggest obstacle will be the last six months or so with wind farms becoming a financial issue. 2023 Average failures per year 9.06 failures per turbine per year. (Anderson et al 2023) 8/9/23 Catastrophic outcome for the (UK) offshore wind sector; failed to deliver. (Guardian) 20/9/23 German wind turbines being torn down to make way for a coal mine, financed by RBC, Canada's biggest bank. (Canada’s National Observer) 12/1/24 Sweden's largest Wind Farm is facing bankruptcy; loss in last 3 years 220 million Euros. (Arctic Business Journal) 17/3/24 Swedish wind farms facing bankruptcy. (Brussels Signal) 20/3/24 Turbine Troubles have sent wind energy stocks tumbling. (CNBC Canada) 27/3/24 Australia's third offshore wind zone shrinks 4/5 to avoid rock lobsters. (Renew Economy) And this one showing the academics have lost a third of their superannuation savings, which many people would consider fitting. 21/3/24 Unisuper Global Environmental Opportunities Fund with assets of $2.5 bn. Has lost $700 million, or one third of its value, largely on the back of weakness in the EV market. The industry super fund giant primarily looks after the savings of the nation’s academics, scientists and researchers and opened to the public three years ago. (The Australian) 1
Marty_d Posted March 27 Posted March 27 There's a climate change thread over in Social Australia where denialists can have their say. 1
kgwilson Posted March 27 Posted March 27 I note that Malcolm Turnbull is one of Radias advisors. Wind energy capture is by far the cheapest of any form of renewable energy and the huge number of installations and turbines far outweigh a few failures here and there are more than 341,000 wind turbines installed around the globe with over 900 GW produced in 2022. 2
kgwilson Posted March 28 Posted March 28 It is a pretty simple looking aircraft. It is just a huge tube which won't be pressurised with a straight wing and 2 tip mounted vertical stabilisers. The only pressurised part will be the cockpit. 4 standard engines off something like an A320 and a 72 tonne payload means it doesn't need all the wheels of the Antonov with only 4 x 4 wheel main bogeys & 2 x 2 wheel steerables up front. It's a modern day Bristol freighter on steroids. 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now