EAA Supports MOSAIC Proposal to Increase Opportunities for Pilots, New Recreational Aircraft

[jackc]

U.S.  FAA changes proposal
 

 

 

https://www.eaa.org/~/media/0cbfb393d341470e8342c56b26662001.ashx

[jackc]

As an addition in the topic, an interesting 43 minute video with my added comment…..

 

https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A//youtu.be/JcXC7BaJowM%3Fsi%3DmiYszFCBU7fvsvR0&text=MOSAIC Roundtable with Dan Johnson%2C Scott Severen and Marc Cook&via=YouTube&related=YouTube,YouTubeTrends,YTCreators

 

There are many times I wished I could live in America and pursue Aviation…..

CASA and any organisation who has a regulatory finger in the Aviation pie, should close their Head Offices in the Jurassic Park Industrial Office Space, and relocate to a big airport, in site of things called Aircraft. You know, those things that have wings and actually fly 🤩🤩

 

 

[spacesailor]

BUT !.

Aircraft that fly " are " dangerous. 

So much better to ground as many as possible,  to make for safer sky's .

spacesailor

 

[turboplanner]

On 02/05/2024 at 6:04 PM, spacesailor said:

BUT !.

Aircraft that fly " are " dangerous. 

So much better to ground as many as possible,  to make for safer sky's .

spacesailor

 

BS

[turboplanner]

On 02/05/2024 at 12:14 PM, jackc said:

As an addition in the topic, an interesting 43 minute video with my added comment…..

 

https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A//youtu.be/JcXC7BaJowM%3Fsi%3DmiYszFCBU7fvsvR0&text=MOSAIC Roundtable with Dan Johnson%2C Scott Severen and Marc Cook&via=YouTube&related=YouTube,YouTubeTrends,YTCreators

 

There are many times I wished I could live in America and pursue Aviation…..

CASA and any organisation who has a regulatory finger in the Aviation pie, should close their Head Offices in the Jurassic Park Industrial Office Space, and relocate to a big airport, in site of things called Aircraft. You know, those things that have wings and actually fly 🤩🤩

 

 

• CASA is not an aviation Association.   
• CASA  is a Safety Authority appointed by the Commonwealth Government to oversee safe flying in Australia.
• CASA fits within the nesting of the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts.

Most of the complaints on this site levelled at CASA belong with other bodies.

Some of the complaints are due to misaligning CASA with the FAA, and  not understanding that both bodies are progressively changing to align with ICAO.  (so RAA members should always be keeping a close eye on the changes withing ICAO)

 

• The aircraft you describe from time to time do belong to an Association (of sorts) Recreational Aviation Australia Ltd.
• The Members of Recreational Aviation Australia, Incorporated (operating under the regulations specifically set up by the Department of Justice in the ACT to protect Sporting Bodies) voted to step away from that protective structure and form a Limited Company, by majority vote.

 

If we look at the EAA link: 

https://www.eaa.org/~/media/0cbfb393d341470e8342c56b26662001.ashx

 

I would expect similar thoughts and promotions to be coming from Recreatioal Aviation Australia Limited relating to recreational aviation in Australia, or one of the similar self administering bodies.

 

The fact that you haven't had a good response from RAA could possibly result from proposals to hijack one on the RAA Australian aircraft categories and recommend Australians fly without registrations or licences. I know they read everything on this site because I've been contacted by them.

 

The solution is to compare what's in the above link with the available RAA catergories and rules, and put up a comprehensive proposal, with draft amendments, proposed rules and proposed specifiocations to replace existing ones. An Association operating understaffed is more likely to accept that format.

 

 

 

 

 

[jackc]

All I can say is…….look at how the U.S. plan works under the FAA? They just keep progressing, albeit with some hiccups, this Mosaic plan they have,  is being adopted by Brazil, now.  Our Aviation regulator still has its head office in Jurassic Park, next to the Dinosaur enclosure. 
RAAus has no real respect as an organisation from me, however some good people work in the organisation and it should not be a Company, and it should wholly comply with part 149, and there are organisations looking to pressure that.

Turbs, its the other way round, I would allege that YOu pass stuff from here to RAA, that’s WHY I lay baits here 🤩

I know my ugly face is the centre target in the RAA lunch room dart board……I am a pin cushion 👍 

As far as FAR Part  103 is concerned, I will always champion  that sector for adoption in Australia, even if illegal.

You do know illegal is a sick bird 🤩. You see, this forum is a sounding board and certain people don’t like certain opinions, then we have the Snitches, bored little wannabes who would love to be out flying, but can’t and they want to pull people down having fun. 
I have been in Aviation for 5 minutes, as time goes on it’s becoming a bigger sh1tfight, and do gooder attitudes don’t help.

Turbs, you have no idea how I work, I have NO qualifications, I have single handedly solve an engineering problem for one of the largest auto companies in the World, the sent 2 of there head office executive to my house and we sat around a table worked out a fix and then executed it.

I have walked into Govt Departments single handedly and provided reports etc and had Govt legislation changed, all the while making long standing friends while at it.  
I don’t care what you, Turbs or anyone else say about me, iI will go on living life and having fun.

‘ Canberra Approach’. This is String Bag 1 requesting permission to land…….String Bag 1 is that you sitting on Taxiway J?  Yes correct Canberra Approach did not want to inconvenience anyone in the pattern, so I thought easiest to land here.  String Bag 1, please taxi to side terminal area, and proceed to tower, as they want to talk  to you, (jingle of handcuffs heard in background).  Mmmmm…..looks like I have a bed tonight, not in a place of my choosing 🤩

 

[turboplanner]

9 minutes ago, jackc said:

All I can say is…….look at how the U.S. plan works under the FAA? They just keep progressing, albeit with some hiccups, this Mosaic plan they have,  is being adopted by Brazil, now.  Our Aviation regulator still has its head office in Jurassic Park, next to the Dinosaur enclosure. 
RAAus has no real respect as an organisation from me, however some good people work in the organisation and it should not be a Company, and it should wholly comply with part 149, and there are organisations looking to pressure that.

Turbs, its the other way round, I would allege that YOu pass stuff from here to RAA, that’s WHY I lay baits here 🤩

I know my ugly face is the centre target in the RAA lunch room dart board……I am a pin cushion 👍 

As far as FAR Part  103 is concerned, I will always champion  that sector for adoption in Australia, even if illegal.

You do know illegal is a sick bird 🤩. You see, this forum is a sounding board and certain people don’t like certain opinions, then we have the Snitches, bored little wannabes who would love to be out flying, but can’t and they want to pull people down having fun. 
I have been in Aviation for 5 minutes, as time goes on it’s becoming a bigger sh1tfight, and do gooder attitudes don’t help.

Turbs, you have no idea how I work, I have NO qualifications, I have single handedly solve an engineering problem for one of the largest auto companies in the World, the sent 2 of there head office executive to my house and we sat around a table worked out a fix and then executed it.

I have walked into Govt Departments single handedly and provided reports etc and had Govt legislation changed, all the while making long standing friends while at it.  
I don’t care what you, Turbs or anyone else say about me, iI will go on living life and having fun.

‘ Canberra Approach’. This is String Bag 1 requesting permission to land…….String Bag 1 is that you sitting on Taxiway J?  Yes correct Canberra Approach did not want to inconvenience anyone in the pattern, so I thought easiest to land here.  String Bag 1, please taxi to side terminal area, and proceed to tower, as they want to talk  to you, (jingle of handcuffs heard in background).  Mmmmm…..looks like I have a bed tonight, not in a place of my choosing 🤩

 

That's nearly as good as the one about the Subaru Turbo.

[jackc]

33 minutes ago, turboplanner said:

That's nearly as good as the one about the Subaru Turbo.

Sounds like a FIGJAM answer 👍

[facthunter]

How is it that CASA contacts YOU about what's on this site Turbs. Nev

Edited May 4 by facthunter

[jackc]

In all honesty, CASA and RAA do probably ring him, because there is not enough knowledge inside either organisation to get much right, so they need every bit of outside help they can get 🤩🤩

I sure know they will NEVER ring me 👍👍

[turboplanner]

8 hours ago, jackc said:

Sounds like a FIGJAM answer 👍

It was an amazing exchange between two Subaru enthusiasts which went public.

[turboplanner]

9 hours ago, jackc said:

Turbs, its the other way round, I would allege that YOu pass stuff from here to RAA, that’s WHY I lay baits here 🤩

Only once to say "No thanks" to a request.

[turboplanner]

8 hours ago, facthunter said:

How is it that CASA contacts YOU about what's on this site Turbs. Nev

No quote as usual.

Wrong.

I didn't say CASA contacts me about what's on this site.

They never have.

[facthunter]

Thanks for the assurance.   Nev

[BrendAn]

3 hours ago, turboplanner said:

Only once to say "No thanks" to a request.

why would you be contacted by raa , seriously tell us why. i can't decide if you are full of crap or not. you drop hints about designing the australian transport industry among other things. there is no substance , not once do you say what you actually do or provide any proof.  i don't say this to be nasty, i would just like a bit of background or proof that its all true.

Edited May 5 by BrendAn

[turboplanner]

38 minutes ago, BrendAn said:

why would you be contacted by raa , seriously tell us why. i can't decide if you are full of crap or not. you drop hints about designing the australian transport industry among other things. there is no substance , not once do you say what you actually do or provide any proof.  i don't say this to be nasty, i would just like a bit of background or proof that its all true.

I was contacted by RAA because an employee liked what I had written. It wasn’t about a crackpot thread.           Any real person who works in the transport industry knows the terminology and knows it wasn’ “designed”.

 

[BrendAn]

43 minutes ago, turboplanner said:

I was contacted by RAA because an employee liked what I had written. It wasn’t about a crackpot thread.           Any real person who works in the transport industry knows the terminology and knows it wasn’ “designed”.

 

I probably used the wrong words but in the past you have often made comments about you designing prime movers and other things like 11r tyres ,maybe I misunderstand what you say.  It always looks like you are the driving force behind almost everything to do with transport in this country. 

And yes I am in the transport industry and have a small fleet of trucks which I wish was even smaller. 

[turboplanner]

7 hours ago, BrendAn said:

I probably used the wrong words but in the past you have often made comments about you designing prime movers and other things like 11r tyres ,maybe I misunderstand what you say.  It always looks like you are the driving force behind almost everything to do with transport in this country. 

And yes I am in the transport industry and have a small fleet of trucks which I wish was even smaller. 

In a nutshell; anyone in the Transport Industry would know that no one person could remotely cover all of transport in this country.

And no, I've never designed tyres.

Edited May 5 by turboplanner

[jackc]

Another industry totally screwed up by Regulators,  ably assisted by many engineer wannabes that can’t even fill a tyre properly with air, let alone work a steering wheel 🤢

[BrendAn]

3 hours ago, turboplanner said:

In a nutshell; anyone in the Transport Industry would know that no one person could remotely cover all of transport in this country.

And no, I've never designed tyres.

It's the way you come across. Read some of your own posts.

[turboplanner]

1 hour ago, BrendAn said:

It's the way you come across. Read some of your own posts.

No, it’s about distorting facts.

[BrendAn]

8 hours ago, turboplanner said:

No, it’s about distorting facts.

you keep alluding that i am not in the transport industry.  i wish it were true. should have payed more attention in school.😁.

and i am not distorting any facts , not much anyway. i am sure you are in some high up position but seems you won't say what it is you actually do i will never know. 

[turboplanner]

I would focus on the Australian aviation classes we have in RA, and try to get some real flying done.

[BrendAn]

20 minutes ago, turboplanner said:

I would focus on the Australian aviation classes we have in RA, and try to get some real flying done.

Ok your right. Getting sidetracked.

But I am going RPL now. Then check ride for my rpc afterwards.

[jackc]

2 hours ago, turboplanner said:

I would focus on the Australian aviation classes we have in RA, and try to get some real flying done.

Turbs, It sounds to me that recent comments you make, indicate your keyboard is due for its 100 hourly?  👍