facthunter Posted May 23 Posted May 23 "PLUNGED" 6000 feet in 3 minutes. That's a moderate rate of descent at height. This is getting to be unabated BS.. IF the seatbelt sign had been ON no one would be hurt. It's easy to put people out of their seats. A sudden altitude restriction on climb will do it.. The slightest negative "G" and you're floating around. You're moving at 480 Knots. Nev
turboplanner Posted May 23 Posted May 23 It seems Singapore Airlines underestimated the number of people who wanted to know precisely what happed. What's out there seems to be Unexpected CAT, aircraft goes into mormal descent after, to 6000' lower allocated altitude. 1
BrendAn Posted May 23 Posted May 23 7 hours ago, facthunter said: I hear this morning it hit an airpocket. There's no such thing.. Certainly attracting a lot of Media attention. Nev never thought of it before, it makes sense nev, how could you even have a pocket of air in the air. its like having a pocket of water in a lake.
Garfly Posted May 23 Posted May 23 16 minutes ago, BrendAn said: never thought of it before, it makes sense nev, how could you even have a pocket of air in the air. its like having a pocket of water in a lake. What are air pockets? | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM And it is time for us to stop using the term? "Basically, there's no such thing. It seems to be a layman's term to describe certain forms of turbulence or windshear," Guy Gratton, an aeronautical engineer, test pilot and professor of aviation and the environment at Cranfield University in the U.K., told Live Science in an email. "I don't personally ever use the term. I don't think it's useful." 1
facthunter Posted May 23 Posted May 23 It's a very old and incorrect term. Never used by people in the game.. Nev 1
Garfly Posted May 31 Posted May 31 On 22/05/2024 at 10:26 AM, planedriver said: I believe the cabin pressure in the Comet was found to be too high which also put stress on the airframe which was not up to the task. This is an interesting video on the demise of the Comet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPP1YQmSNnU
facthunter Posted May 31 Posted May 31 It was fully investigated at the time and tests were done pressured in a water tank. All findings were passed onto Boeing . It was happening to planes with a bit of time in service. Nev
Garfly Posted May 31 Posted May 31 Another one for Comet fans. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nfH16RpXjs
facthunter Posted June 1 Posted June 1 It would want to be better than the last one. The structure of the Comet fuselage was far too weak and the skin too thin.. I've seen plenty of unlined aircraft fuselages. The style and technical presentation was not up to scratch either. I don't see U tube as the place to trust for all this.. Nev
RFguy Posted June 1 Posted June 1 (edited) Like Nev said, if people would have their seatbelts on... idiots..... I have zero feelings for the people who got hurt on SQ while sitting in their seats without seatbelts on. I always say to the pax next to me , that it's a good idea to always wear a seatbelt whenever practical in case of explosive decompression, and give examples (pan-am, hawaiian etc). of course if you were on your way to the loo at the time, that's bad luck. wonder how to cabin crew faired ? Edited June 1 by RFguy 1
facthunter Posted June 1 Posted June 1 Not too well generally but they know more than most what the risks are and would react more appropriately. Nev
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now