kiwiaviator Posted yesterday at 05:29 AM Posted yesterday at 05:29 AM https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/emergency-services-responding-to-unfolding-aviation-incident-at-tasman-bay-near-nelson/BZ4PVY52UJAZPJGKYPAMNPVQAQ/ Great outcome. Weather was good and emergency response quick which contributed to the pilot surviving. I understand he was in the water for nearly an hour. 90% of ditchings are survivable. Its just what happens after that which determines the fate of those onboard. 1 1
facthunter Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago The tripacer wouldn't be my choice of plane to ditch in. Nev
rgmwa Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago If it was my choice I’d prefer something with floats but unfortunately you’ve got to work with what you’ve got. He did pretty well in the circumstances.
Student Pilot Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 19 hours ago, kiwiaviator said: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/emergency-services-responding-to-unfolding-aviation-incident-at-tasman-bay-near-nelson/BZ4PVY52UJAZPJGKYPAMNPVQAQ/ Great outcome. Weather was good and emergency response quick which contributed to the pilot surviving. I understand he was in the water for nearly an hour. 90% of ditchings are survivable. Its just what happens after that which determines the fate of those onboard. Where did you get those statistics? 90%?
kiwiaviator Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Student Pilot said: Where did you get those statistics? 90%? Sorry. I should cite my sources 🙂 BTW 90% is an approximation for the initial survivability. Schick VC, Boyd DD, Hippler C, Hinkelbein J. Survival After Ditching in Motorized Aircraft, 1989-2022. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024 May 1;95(5):254-258. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.6332.2024. PMID: 38715275. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38715275/
facthunter Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago There's a lot of ways of getting it wrong. Water is Hard at speed. Seaplanes don't cope with swells. Read the PG Taylors Catalina experience. Nev
rankamateur Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, kiwiaviator said: Sorry. I should cite my sources 🙂 BTW 90% is an approximation for the initial survivability. Schick VC, Boyd DD, Hippler C, Hinkelbein J. Survival After Ditching in Motorized Aircraft, 1989-2022. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024 May 1;95(5):254-258. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.6332.2024. PMID: 38715275. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38715275/ Nicely played! Troll proof.
RossK Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Student Pilot said: Where did you get those statistics? 90%? Also this https://www.avweb.com/multimedia/votw/miami-accident-dont-be-fearful-of-ditching/ 1
facthunter Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) The more you know about good techniques the better the Job will BE . IF the article is promoting something it can also be a bit biased.. .IF you have to ditch you don't have an option.. I know of a few heavies that didn't turn out so well and some seaplanes don't even make it into the air in slightly rough conditions. IF you manage to get airborne on a swell but sink back down and hit the next swell firmly you are custard. Same when Landing. The second contact is the heavy one. You may even bury the nose and that's a very sudden stop. Float planes landing wheel down, crash. Nev Edited 1 hour ago by facthunter expand
Thruster88 Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago A Thruster carefully prepared with some inflatable mattresses in the wings has been demonstrated to work in very hostile conditions. The only successful ditching in Bass Straight?
kiwiaviator Posted 22 minutes ago Author Posted 22 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, Thruster88 said: A Thruster carefully prepared with some inflatable mattresses in the wings has been demonstrated to work in very hostile conditions. The only successful ditching in Bass Straight? Details please Sounds as intriguing as the bloke who flew his sofa over LAX airspace a few haircuts ago..
facthunter Posted 21 minutes ago Posted 21 minutes ago Aerial rubber ducky. It's a bit of fairly wild water. Did a search for a missing light aircraft in a "Borrowed" CASA F 27 with 9 of their observers on board. No sign of it. we got down fairly LOW. It had a bit of a name as AUSTRALIA's Bermuda Triangle. Nev
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now