danny_galaga Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago (edited) 60 passengers and crew on board. Not sounding good. Pretty much the coldest time of year. https://www.9news.com.au/world/washington-dc-flight-plane-crash-helicopter-what-we-know-so-far/f23953ec-1c5f-4954-88d9-cf9f57f0d41b Edited 20 hours ago by danny_galaga 1 3
danny_galaga Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago Early footage . I'm sure there will be more to come 1 1
onetrack Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago I'll be surprised if there's any survivors. You can see the aircraft exploded upon impact with the helicopter, and hitting freezing water at possibly 250kmh, would mean a lot of fatalities instantly - and any survivors would be struggling to escape the wreckage before they froze. I think you get about 10 mins in freezing water before you start to get hypothermia. The aircraft was a Bombardier CRJ700. 2
onetrack Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Some confusion over the passenger aircraft load. Some information coming through, that only 38 seats were booked. A small saving grace is that the Potomac is only 3 feet to 7 feet deep where the wreckage landed. Then of course, there's the major question of what ATC were doing, when they must have sighted emerging collision courses - and what was a helicopter doing, flying through an approach lane at low altitude? 1 1
BrendAn Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago How the hell did a military chopper get in the way of an airliner. 1
danny_galaga Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago Part of the air traffic control transcript has them asking one of them if they had the other sighted. It is amazing this can still happen with all the tech in airliners and especially military aircraft. Plus control radar. 2 1
NT5224 Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago For those of you that know this stuff… Do military aircraft operate on the same frequencies and ATC systems? Flying in the Top End I have had both fast jets and helicopter pass close to me/under me, and assume they didnt even know I was there. I was carrying ADSB but they weren’t on it… How would separation normally be maintained between a military helicopter and a commercial airliner? Alann 3 1
BrendAn Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 21 minutes ago, NT5224 said: For those of you that know this stuff… Do military aircraft operate on the same frequencies and ATC systems? Flying in the Top End I have had both fast jets and helicopter pass close to me/under me, and assume they didnt even know I was there. I was carrying ADSB but they weren’t on it… How would separation normally be maintained between a military helicopter and a commercial airliner? Alann i was told the raaf aircraft in our area know exactly where we are long before we see anything. 2 1
BurnieM Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago We have daily half a dozen navy helos and the occassional low level C130 around Shellharbour and they all have ADS-B. 2
Thruster88 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago After watching blancolirios vid it could only be described as a cluster f on so many levels. 2 1
KRviator Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 51 minutes ago, danny_galaga said: Part of the air traffic control transcript has them asking one of them if they had the other sighted. It is amazing this can still happen with all the tech in airliners and especially military aircraft. Plus control radar. Problem is, radar separation requirements are far greater than that required for visual separation. Which is why controllers will clear you for a visual approach vs instrument where possible. And by issuing a clearance to traffic to 'pass behind XYZ' that places the responsibility for separation on the pilot, not the ATCO. I reckon people would be surprised at just how little collision-avoidance equipment is carried on something like a Blackhawk. 2
BurnieM Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Thruster88 said: After watching blancolirios vid it could only be described as a cluster f on so many levels. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouDAnO8eMf8 2
danny_galaga Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago 18 minutes ago, BurnieM said: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouDAnO8eMf8 Juan is about the only accident reporter I look at nowadays. 1 1
onetrack Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago The graphics that show visual separation at low level, at high-traffic locations, at night - where there's a huge amount of ground-level lighting - just doesn't work. 2
Thruster88 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Why would the helicopter not cross over directly above the runway?, to be flying in the known approach path of large passenger jets seems stupid. 1 1
spenaroo Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 2 hours ago, KRviator said: Problem is, radar separation requirements are far greater than that required for visual separation. Which is why controllers will clear you for a visual approach vs instrument where possible. And by issuing a clearance to traffic to 'pass behind XYZ' that places the responsibility for separation on the pilot, not the ATCO. I reckon people would be surprised at just how little collision-avoidance equipment is carried on something like a Blackhawk. Especially on a national guard aircraft. These are the reserve forces. Using older equipment 2
onetrack Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago (edited) It was a training flight for the helicopter crew, and this "training scenario" is starting to rear its ugly head more often recently in air disasters. Too much looking inside the cockpit, and not enough looking outside? Edited 16 hours ago by onetrack 2
onetrack Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago U.S. rescue authorities have retrieved 28 bodies from the wreckage of both aircraft and they are stating there will be no survivors from the disaster, so the death toll will end up 67 in total. RIP to the victims and sympathy to the distraught families, there were quite a number of young people on the CRJ700, nearly an entire team of figure-skating professionals. Trumps response has been to issue an executive order banning DEI hires in any Govt Aviation authority, but there's no proof at this point, that any DEI selection process had anything to do with the crash. 1 2
turboplanner Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago There is video of the Tower asking the Helicopter PIC if he could see the approaching aircraft. 2
red750 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Trump is blaming Democrat policies and DEI for the crash because the FAA hired people with physical and psychological problems, when last week he sacked all those people, who were replaced by lesser trained people. 1
danny_galaga Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 9 hours ago, onetrack said: U.S. rescue authorities have retrieved 28 bodies from the wreckage of both aircraft and they are stating there will be no survivors from the disaster, so the death toll will end up 67 in total. RIP to the victims and sympathy to the distraught families, there were quite a number of young people on the CRJ700, nearly an entire team of figure-skating professionals. Trumps response has been to issue an executive order banning DEI hires in any Govt Aviation authority, but there's no proof at this point, that any DEI selection process had anything to do with the crash. He is a disgusting opportunistic troll. 3
Admin Posted 20 minutes ago Posted 20 minutes ago Hi All, lets keep the politics out of this...thanks 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now