RAA HQ - legal issues and claims

[BrendAn]

36 minutes ago, facthunter said:

People are entitled to the Presumption of Innocence until charged and proven guilty. Let's just allow that shall we? Nev

You do you what you want nev

[facthunter]

Just telling you the LAW. This site doesn't belong to  you.. Nev

[aro]

2 hours ago, facthunter said:

People are entitled to the Presumption of Innocence until charged and proven guilty.

Presumption of innocence only exists in the context of a criminal trial and applies to judge and jury. Outside of that people are free to hold opinions and express them within the limits of libel/slander etc.

[facthunter]

Aren't we assuming it WILL go to a prosecution? We can be rightly concerned about the costs so far but a   few people here are not without a  vested interest in  This affair   IF proceedings are not happening , then it's another matter.  WE don't know yet (as far as I know) but only then will some people be free to elaborate if they wish to. I just believe in the fair go for everybody  on such occasions. I'm not against free speech if that's a coming accusation. It's been used before.  Nev

[jackc]

Regardless what happens? RAA are now liable for $300,000 legal fees at this time but we have not been told the whole picture.

[aro]

35 minutes ago, facthunter said:

Aren't we assuming it WILL go to a prosecution?

It might, but even then the presumption of innocence is required from the judge and the jury. Anyone else is free to draw their own conclusions.

From the Coroner's report:

I am compelled to conclude that RAAus engaged in a deliberate strategy to hide these key
issues from the Court. Ms Bailey gave evidence which was false in material respects,
which also served to hide these key issues.

 

There's no reason to presume that to be untrue.

[BurnieM]

There are two potential legal actions here.

 

A criminal action for withholding information from the Coroner.

This depends on how p*ssed off the Coroners Office are and how much pressure their management apply to the DPP.

 

A civil action for negilence in issuing his certificate and endorsements.

His girlfriend appears pretty motivated to pursue this.

 

 

Edited 11 hours ago by BurnieM

[facthunter]

All these budding Lawyers.You are missing your calling. His girlfriend KNEW he was unsafe and knew he was going to fly that day. Nev

[spacesailor]

My wife does not understand torque values .

Everything get the full 'death' grip turn . I have to change 'tap ' washers twice yearly .

Swmbo doesn't drive but owns a vehicle. 

Smart ! , always has a chauffeur. 

spacesailor

[FlyBoy1960]

1 hour ago, facthunter said:

All these budding Lawyers.You are missing your calling. His girlfriend KNEW he was unsafe and knew he was going to fly that day. Nev

She was nod a wife who knew nothing, she was training also!