CASA Legislative Instrument 18/22 repealed 28 Feb 2025

[rodgerc]

I expect this topic will have a limited audience, but here goes….

 

The CASA legislative instrument (CASA 18/22) that authorises amateur builders to conduct their own maintenance expires today. (28 Feb 2025)

 

Does anyone know if a replacement instrument exists?

[KRviator]

If it does - I can't find it on the CAsA website. But that's not altogether surprising, given the convoluted nature of their sites design. SAAA still references 18/22.

[facthunter]

That was a major part of the ESSENCE of the movement.. . Where to, now?  Nev

[rodgerc]

CASA’s website states that 18/22 has been repealed today and there is no replacement listed.

I’m guessing that a replacement does exist and maybe it will be up next week…Given that ~10% of the Australian GA fleet is amateur built (and maintained), it would be “inconvenient” if a new legislative instrument was not available. 

[facthunter]

But ... WHO would care. Just say it's a SAFETY issue and you're done. Nev

Edited February 28 by facthunter

[rodgerc]

We can relax….

[facthunter]

So, WHAT is going on?  Does the right hand Know what the left one is doing?   Nev

[rodgerc]

The image above confirms that a legislative instrument extending the repealed version (CASA 18/22) exists, it just hasn’t been published yet….We’ll wait a few days to sign-off the new Maintenance Release to ensure the ducks all line-up. 

[facthunter]

Stake Holder Engagement. What genius dreamt up that Department Title?  Nev

[Area-51]

Fact checking will reveal that a "stakeholder", "an individual holding a stake", is an important part of a cohesive society, especially with regard to social and community events... Not to be confused with "steakholder", being "an individual holding a steak", also an important part of a cohesive society, especially in regard to social and community events, however difference can be noted in the later by way of added situational experiences of extended intimate and less public affairs, however this may not always be the case and often a scenario of seeing a stakeholder beside a steakholder in both public and more private situations may be viewed as a common occurrence, the main difference being asymmetrical proportions of stakeholders and steakholders within a more public setting, but this may not always prove to be a finite conclusion and therefore one should always approach all situations with more than a grain of salt.

[turboplanner]

8 minutes ago, Area-51 said:

Fact checking will reveal that a "stakeholder", "an individual holding a stake", is an important part of a cohesive society, especially with regard to social and community events... Not to be confused with "steakholder", being "an individual holding a steak", also an important part of a cohesive society, especially in regard to social and community events, however difference can be noted in the later by way of added situational experiences of extended intimate and less public affairs, however this may not always be the case and often a scenario of seeing a stakeholder beside a steakholder in both public and more private situations may be viewed as a common occurrence, the main difference being asymmetrical proportions of stakeholders and steakholders within a more public setting, but this may not always prove to be a finite conclusion and therefore one should always approach all situations with more than a grain of salt.

Well it's like this; there may be an issue, or even a good idea that CASA want to communicate to pilots, but do the just limit it to RPT Pilots, Charter Pilots, CPL, PPL and leave out the riff raff like Hang Gliders, RA Pilots or the old Grumps that never stop whining? If they leave someone out, someone else will find out and complain about Natural Justice; if they just leave the old Grump out he's going to be writing stinging posts for a month. So they have to pick their market, and their negative risk if tey want to keep the message away from a long line of people.

 

Of course, if they are sending a message to everyone they'd be typing for half an hour and if they forgot one, they'd get the stiging posts, so they database all those groups under the heading Stakeholders, so everyone feels important and part of a big picture.

 

It just stratifies groups where all might get Attachment A, some might get an Attachmenbt B, some might get an attachment B, C, D etc depending on how they are classified.

 

 

[rodgerc]

I prefer to be a steak eater than a stakeholder….Preferably with more than just a grain of salt, and a grind of black pepper too. 

[Area-51]

11 hours ago, rodgerc said:

I prefer to be a steak eater than a stakeholder….Preferably with more than just a grain of salt, and a grind of black pepper too. 

You can be both stakeholder and steakholder eating steak all at the same time; so its ok, you cannot be arrested or issued a penalty notice

[440032]

16/25 came up on the Fed website on Thursday morning.

Instrument 16/25 simply amended the end date of 18/22 before it expired, nothing more. (CASA just moved the finish line) INST 18/22 lives on, victoriously.

SAAA members can expect a broadcast Mon or Tues. Had hoped for late Thurs, but alas........ not the end of the world. (that's on a Tuesday, later in the year.)

[onetrack]

It sounds to me like the steaks are being raised here...

[Love to fly]

6 hours ago, 440032 said:

16/25 came up on the Fed website on Thursday morning.

Instrument 16/25 simply amended the end date of 18/22 before it expired, nothing more. (CASA just moved the finish line) INST 18/22 lives on, victoriously.

SAAA members can expect a broadcast Mon or Tues. Had hoped for late Thurs, but alas........ not the end of the world. (that's on a Tuesday, later in the year.)

Sheesh don't spoil a budding conspiracy with the truth 🤔😅

[Area-51]

18/22 sounds cooked; 16/22 is bit on the raw side; 22/22 even the dog walked away 😆😆😆