RAAus magazine

[Headwind]

While it seems RAAus is a popular thing to kick at the moment, may I ask if I’m the only one who is utterly sick of PC, social engineering, whatever you want to call it, within organisations such as RAAus, and of late their magazine. Australian Sport Pilot was once a reasonable read, but yesterday I opened the latest edition to find another article (the first was in the previous mag) claiming to be written by a not-yet teenage girl. In this day and age of so-called influencers, it’s pretty obvious what is going on: little girls mummy wants daughter to be famous (mummy wants to be famous too but will use child to achieve this), little girl is primped and preened, and camera is always ready to take a picture, mummy writes articles for little girl, little girl wants to be a pilot and drive expensive cars, but gosh so many choices. Mummy fools the RAAus team into thinking that the ‘articles’ are suitable for the magazine, and a star is born. 
Yeah, I get it that RAAus is trying to broaden its membership but this is ludicrous. It may be suitable for Dolly magazine, but if RAAus wants to be taken seriously they need to kick this crap down the road; they are being taken for a ride by little girls mummy. 

[jackc]

They have lost their way, they advertise the latest plastic fantastic aircraft, they want to be GA and have forgotten where thy came from🤩

See pic,  and they  probably would like to see aircraft pictured, in a museum…..

[FlyingVizsla]

You're confusing the RAAus team with the Publishers and Editors of the Sport Pilot magazine.  The RAAus team contribute regular articles with their names on.  The rest of the content is provided by the Editors.  They have Travel magazines in their stable, so I suspect some articles are re-purposed with a little "aviation" tweaking.  They do some easy to assemble articles like Aviation Pioneers, Media releases, aircraft manufacturer's blurb.  They take whatever articles people send them. 

 

I guess a photogenic young girl & her instructor are glossy magazine fodder, but to give her her due, she is studying aviation at school through a Qantas sponsored program, and has been in several States to get to this point.  Nice to have the money to do that ....

[spacesailor]

" Civil Aviation Safety  Aurthority " .

The safe aircraft are not  flying .

Has Any museum aircraft crashed lately. 

spacesailor

[skippydiesel]

"You're confusing the RAAus team with the Publishers and Editors of the Sport Pilot magazine." 

 

This winger has no confusion - SP  is supposed to represent Recreational Aviation Australia (RAA) AND MEMBERSHIP.

 

I haven't been around long enough to know if it ever represented the opinions/concerns/interest of the members. What I do know is its sunk, from a mediocre publication,  to an unbelievably low standard, since the last editor .

 

With the exception of most of the RAA staff submissions and the very occasional little gem, it has become just a trash magazine.

 

If I didnt get it as part of my membership (a sore point - rather pay less ) I certainly would not buy it.😈

[jackc]

But it nice and shiny, with lovely glossy pages produced at great cost 🤢 The membership pays?

[turboplanner]

59 minutes ago, jackc said:

But it nice and shiny, with lovely glossy pages produced at great cost 🤢 The membership pays?

They do.

There was a long and bitter fight over it and the old geysers won because they said they couldn't read off screens.

[kgwilson]

I've read nothing of the new Mag I received today but a glance through indicates very little of interest. The Dolly girl had 2 articles in last quarters Mag both with very staged pics & articles that appeared well beyond her age & the same in this one & I agree with Headwind. There is little of interest to real aviators. The mag has become a travelogue. What happened to builder logs and technical info.

 

What would be of interest would be an article on the scandal regarding RAA being referred to the Vic DPP over the lies & cover up that saw the demise of Jill Bailey & Matt Boutell.

Edited 4 hours ago by kgwilson

[facthunter]

There's a place for that elsewhere on the forum and since it MAY be subject to a Court Process there's not a lot that the Magazine could write about it.. Have we all prejudged RAAus & Jill Bailey.? That's for you to consider, not debate here as there's such a thing as presumption of  Innocence until PROVEN Guilty. EVERYONE should be entitled to it. Nev

[spacesailor]

  " Innocent untill proven guilty " .

Not in Australia  !.

In all taxation matters ' you Are guilty,  untill you prove your Innocence ' .

spacesailor

Edited 48 minutes ago by spacesailor
Spelling twice