Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

While it seems RAAus is a popular thing to kick at the moment, may I ask if I’m the only one who is utterly sick of PC, social engineering, whatever you want to call it, within organisations such as RAAus, and of late their magazine. Australian Sport Pilot was once a reasonable read, but yesterday I opened the latest edition to find another article (the first was in the previous mag) claiming to be written by a not-yet teenage girl. In this day and age of so-called influencers, it’s pretty obvious what is going on: little girls mummy wants daughter to be famous (mummy wants to be famous too but will use child to achieve this), little girl is primped and preened, and camera is always ready to take a picture, mummy writes articles for little girl, little girl wants to be a pilot and drive expensive cars, but gosh so many choices. Mummy fools the RAAus team into thinking that the ‘articles’ are suitable for the magazine, and a star is born. 
Yeah, I get it that RAAus is trying to broaden its membership but this is ludicrous. It may be suitable for Dolly magazine, but if RAAus wants to be taken seriously they need to kick this crap down the road; they are being taken for a ride by little girls mummy. 

  • Like 4
  • Agree 1
Posted

They have lost their way, they advertise the latest plastic fantastic aircraft, they want to be GA and have forgotten where thy came from🤩

See pic,  and they  probably would like to see aircraft pictured, in a museum…..

IMG_1179.png

  • Like 2
Posted

You're confusing the RAAus team with the Publishers and Editors of the Sport Pilot magazine.  The RAAus team contribute regular articles with their names on.  The rest of the content is provided by the Editors.  They have Travel magazines in their stable, so I suspect some articles are re-purposed with a little "aviation" tweaking.  They do some easy to assemble articles like Aviation Pioneers, Media releases, aircraft manufacturer's blurb.  They take whatever articles people send them. 

 

I guess a photogenic young girl & her instructor are glossy magazine fodder, but to give her her due, she is studying aviation at school through a Qantas sponsored program, and has been in several States to get to this point.  Nice to have the money to do that ....

  • Informative 1
Posted

" Civil Aviation Safety  Aurthority " .

The safe aircraft are not  flying .

Has Any museum aircraft crashed lately. 

spacesailor

Posted

"You're confusing the RAAus team with the Publishers and Editors of the Sport Pilot magazine." 

 

This winger has no confusion - SP  is supposed to represent Recreational Aviation Australia (RAA) AND MEMBERSHIP.

 

I haven't been around long enough to know if it ever represented the opinions/concerns/interest of the members. What I do know is its sunk, from a mediocre publication,  to an unbelievably low standard, since the last editor .

 

With the exception of most of the RAA staff submissions and the very occasional little gem, it has become just a trash magazine.

 

If I didnt get it as part of my membership (a sore point - rather pay less ) I certainly would not buy it.😈

  • Winner 1
Posted

But it nice and shiny, with lovely glossy pages produced at great cost 🤢 The membership pays?

  • Haha 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, jackc said:

But it nice and shiny, with lovely glossy pages produced at great cost 🤢 The membership pays?

They do.

There was a long and bitter fight over it and the old geysers won because they said they couldn't read off screens.

Posted (edited)

I've read nothing of the new Mag I received today but a glance through indicates very little of interest. The Dolly girl had 2 articles in last quarters Mag both with very staged pics & articles that appeared well beyond her age & the same in this one & I agree with Headwind. There is little of interest to real aviators. The mag has become a travelogue. What happened to builder logs and technical info.

 

What would be of interest would be an article on the scandal regarding RAA being referred to the Vic DPP over the lies & cover up that saw the demise of Jill Bailey & Matt Boutell.

Edited by kgwilson
  • Like 2
Posted

There's a place for that elsewhere on the forum and since it MAY be subject to a Court Process there's not a lot that the Magazine could write about it.. Have we all prejudged RAAus & Jill Bailey.? That's for you to consider, not debate here as there's such a thing as presumption of  Innocence until PROVEN Guilty. EVERYONE should be entitled to it. Nev

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

  " Innocent untill proven guilty " .

Not in Australia  !.

In all taxation matters ' you Are guilty,  untill you prove your Innocence ' .

spacesailor

Edited by spacesailor
Spelling twice
  • Like 1
Posted

Everybody is invited to put forward stories that they feel may be of interest to others. It's ok to sit back and have a grumble about the magazines content but how many aviators put pen to paper for the rest of us to read? If you have a story that is worthy of publication get it out there and then the rest of us might enjoy flicking through the SP magazine.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 3
Posted
41 minutes ago, Moneybox said:

Everybody is invited to put forward stories that they feel may be of interest to others. It's ok to sit back and have a grumble about the magazines content but how many aviators put pen to paper for the rest of us to read? If you have a story that is worthy of publication get it out there and then the rest of us might enjoy flicking through the SP magazine.

Most sports have the same problem, it's always someone else's job to write the stories.

Same problem with finding people to attend shows, get things done  etc. They always have an excuse, "I have a wedding on that day" is the favourite. I was asking one guy and he didn't think before he answered "I'm gonna be sick that day".

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
Posted

There is no comparison between an amature/club magazine produced by the mebers and one that employs, supposedly, skilled people (journalists?)to deliver a professional publication (SP?).😈

Posted
32 minutes ago, skippydiesel said:

There is no comparison between an amature/club magazine produced by the mebers and one that employs, supposedly, skilled people (journalists?)to deliver a professional publication (SP?).😈

 

It depends on what you want to read. If you want articles of interest to aviators then perhaps you'd get the most interesting written by aviators and where are you going to find those?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, skippydiesel said:

There is no comparison between an amature/club magazine produced by the mebers and one that employs, supposedly, skilled people (journalists?)to deliver a professional publication (SP?).😈

No, there's not, so as a member of a limited volume group, what would you be expecting?

Posted

The Printed version is a significant cost item that has to be Borne by members or have some other way of offsetting the cost and that is what you have now.  Nev

Posted
11 minutes ago, Moneybox said:

 

It depends on what you want to read. If you want articles of interest to aviators then perhaps you'd get the most interesting written by aviators and where are you going to find those?

True! Up to a limited point.  In the (unlikly) event of a slew of pilot articles being submitted, additional staff may have to be employed to;

  • Read & evaluate each submission
  • Fact check all claims
  • Possibly reframe/precis 

Of interest to me would be articles on; 

  • Independent test flight of aircraft with full review of actual performance, rather than the marketing/sales drivel we usually get. Included would be price range (delivered to AU)  from basic registerable aircraft  to top of the line fit out. This would require pilot/journalist to be properly compensated for their time & costs - unlikly scenario. You get what you pay for & we have Mr Heath.
  • Flight control surface set up & effects
  • Engine management maintenance/cooling/etc
  • Obtaining best  trip fuel economy

 

😈

 

Posted

Members won't want a fee rise and whatever they do they will have some criticism of.  "Keeping a Group of Pilots HAPPY" is a definition of the Impossible. Nev

  • Agree 1
Posted

There it is ! .

Lots of articles on this " RecreationakFlying  " forum .

can't we lend them a few , like ' aviation jokes & silly picture ' .

Science & technology.  Wouldn't go amiss either. 

( SILLY THOUGHT ).

spacesailor

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...