skippydiesel Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago 3 hours ago, onetrack said: But there ARE restrictions on certain areas of airspace you are NOT allowed to transit, are there not? Military airspace, tall buildings airspace, certain areas deemed by councils to be "no-fly areas"? Skippy, I think you're simplifying a principle that is nuanced, depending on who has obtained, and where they have applied, controls over certain areas of airspace. Already covered those in earlier post. Just making the point, no private owner can own/control the airspace above their property😈
turboplanner Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Before talking about these things and going off the rails, better to get the legislation for your State and see what it says. There are plenty of Tribunal cases for precedents in Planning and building etc. 2
spacesailor Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago I have often been advised , " to fly 10-1103 on private land " . Most agree ' it should be land owned by me . ( on paper ) to be legal . Three ' property owners ' have offered land, for flying the Hummel-Bird . spacesailor
skippydiesel Posted 14 hours ago Author Posted 14 hours ago 2 hours ago, turboplanner said: Before talking about these things and going off the rails, better to get the legislation for your State and see what it says. There are plenty of Tribunal cases for precedents in Planning and building etc. Aviation is a Federal matter. I doubt that State law, has jurisdiction at an "level" when it comes to air navigation & the authority of the PIC . Australian Air law (CASA) is a combination of Federal and International air law, with a strong trend towards International, for the simple very common sense aim, of standardisation, to facilitate flights between countries.😈
turboplanner Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Your problem Skippy is that you still haven't produced ANY laws. That would be a start. Then there is the matter of what is being discussed which is payment for using the property, which hasn't been addressed. Then there is the morality where the low lifes that cheat their way out of paying spoil it for the genuine users, and when costs aren't covered, it's an easy decision for an owner/council to find something that returns a profit like building houses or factories on the site. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now