skippydiesel Posted Friday at 08:22 AM Posted Friday at 08:22 AM Reference ; Trying to get the need for private pilots to hold an ASIC card , for access to to small rural Security Controlled Airports, abolished I have written to RAA - Got a two nice replies from Maxine (CEO) - in summary, total abdication of their representative function. Advised to contact local member. Have written to local member - as expected no response. If this changes will advise accordingly. The reality is, any politician contacted about this matter, is likly to do the vote maths v risk and decide its not worth their time. 31,000(?) private pilots , spread over the entire country, do no represent a significant lobby UNLESS their representative organisations take up the cause. "'She'll - be - right - mate" (apathy) rules the day😈
facthunter Posted Friday at 08:37 AM Posted Friday at 08:37 AM You've been told that before. You're flogging a Dead horse. I don't like it either/ It doesn't even count points towards a Passport being issued. RAAus represents the CASA Only something LIKE AOPA can do anything. . Nev
Headwind Posted yesterday at 03:25 AM Posted yesterday at 03:25 AM 18 hours ago, facthunter said: You've been told that before. You're flogging a Dead horse. I don't like it either/ It doesn't even count points towards a Passport being issued. RAAus represents the CASA Only something LIKE AOPA can do anything. . Nev Like AOPA, but not AOPA? AOPA seems to bugger all.
facthunter Posted yesterday at 03:31 AM Posted yesterday at 03:31 AM There's no one else so you're up that Creek without a paddle. Nev
spacesailor Posted yesterday at 03:51 AM Posted yesterday at 03:51 AM (edited) Except for " licensing " what is the difference between CASA & RaA . Insurance, any difference in the two agencies. Could CASA ' MAKE ' A loophole for any members willing to be under CASA. spacesailor Edited yesterday at 03:53 AM by spacesailor
facthunter Posted yesterday at 05:27 AM Posted yesterday at 05:27 AM CASA doesn't insure aircraft or pay for it unless they Operate it. . Nev
Jerry_Atrick Posted yesterday at 07:31 AM Posted yesterday at 07:31 AM (edited) Thanks, @skippydiesel - I know others are bored by it, but it is a fundamental right to express discourse at government policy, and continue to do so if you feel wronged. Of course, this is a private forum and those entrusted with moderation can close it down, but I knew what this was before I clicked into the thread, and if I was that affronted by it, I simply wouldn't have clicked. But, I agree with Nev.. so far, you have pursued both organisational and direct representation. For some reason, the organisations have decided not to pursue - maybe they have been told it is flogging a dead horse by the relevant department (it's not CASA, but some other department that is responsible). But that doesn't mean you (or anyone else who feels passionately wronged) should give up. What are your options? Here's a couple that may or may not be pragmatic: Go to the press. This is unlikely to be a vote winner of any consequence, so the bigger outlets are unlikely to take it on, esp during a federal election, but try some nice journals that are complimentary to aviation such as the yachties ones, gun runners, and the like.. Cross pollination can help.. Also, look for a situation that has occurred where the ASIC resulted in some hardship, especially disproportionate to the risk it is supposedly mitigating.. did someone crash and die in deteriorating weather by possibly making a decision to divert to a non-ASIC required aerodrome when an ASIC one would have been better (look up Strasser scheme in the UK, where Strasser managed to convince regional RPT airports in the UK to waive extortionate fees in the case of real emergencies as pilots were crashing and dying as a result of diverting to less suitable airfields). Go on Social media - YT, Tick Tock and the like and do the press thing yourself. You would be surprised at how much of a following you can get if it resonates. And with a following, you become the representative. Find a pollie that is in some way affected by it and lobby that politician. GA were complaining here for years at the erosion of their plight to all sorts of pollies until someone realised the one they should be complaining to is the one that has a PPL (Grant Schapps).. Next thing, he is a senior minister with a portfolio over the CAA and things did improve slightly. Yes, Dick Smith tried it at the helm, but he wasn't an elected pollie. Maybe join one of the major political parties (the one more likely than not to be in government - regardless of your affiliations) and try and engineer change from within. Again, this is not a vote winner, so this will probably not yield great results for the effort. Go streaking across your nearest international airport with a banner saying stop asic at regional airports. You can be guaranteed some publicity (and a few nights in jail - so maybe take this one in the way it is intended - not an incitement). But, you can organise protests... Seriously, you are fighting a big machine that saw points in implementing it and very few points in removing it. There are many on here (myself included) that support your position. But even collectively, that is not a large number and we are already converted.. Need to preach to the unconverted with as many converted visible as possible. It will be a long process. Edited yesterday at 07:35 AM by Jerry_Atrick 1 1
skippydiesel Posted yesterday at 08:39 AM Author Posted yesterday at 08:39 AM My faith in humanity is restored - Thanks Jerry_ Atrick. Seems to me that Australians are particularity uninterested in fighting for their rights " she'll - be -right - mate". I am not against having my rights infringed/reduced, where it can be demonstrated that there is a greater good . ASIC not only infringes my rights without a demonstrable benefit BUT also costs me (all of us) as a taxpayer. Australia has the unenviable reputation of being one of the World's' least democratic democracies - ASIC is just a small example of this. It seem that private plots (on this Forum) are quite content with this double rort - if they weren't then their voices would be heard by RAA (our representative body) and something would have to be done, but noooo, all toooo hard. The fact is, no one/or organisation has made a significant effort to get this crap law modified. so that it does not apply to small rural airports.😈
spacesailor Posted yesterday at 08:54 AM Posted yesterday at 08:54 AM "CASA does not insure aircraft" But we do need insurance from some company. so is it cheaper for a Raa Jabiru ' or an equally appointed ' Vh jabiru ' , Seems a simple question . spacesailor
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now