Seal Posted February 25, 2009 Posted February 25, 2009 This is a shameless pinch from, of all places, NASA Spaceflight Forum. Did you ever read Ernest Nagels "Symbolic Logic, Haddock Eyes and the Dog-Walking Ordinance"? It goes like this: From the Minutes of a Borough Council Meeting: Councilor Trafford took exception to the proposed notice at the entrance of South Park: “No dogs must be brought to this Park except on a lead.†He pointed out that this order would not prevent an owner from releasing his pets, or pet, from a lead when once safely inside the Park. The Chairman (Colonel Vine): What alternative wording would you propose, Councilor? Councilor Trafford: “Dogs are not allowed in this Park without leads.†Councilor Hogg: Mr. Chairman, I object. The order should be addressed to the owners, not to the dogs. Councilor Trafford: That is a nice point. Very well then: “Owners of dogs are not allowed in this Park unless they keep them on leads.†Councilor Hogg: Mr. Chairman, I object. Strictly speaking, this would prevent me as a dog-owner from leaving my dog in the back-garden at home and walking with Mrs. Hogg across the Park. Councilor Trafford: Mr. Chairman, I suggest that our legalistic friend be asked to redraft the notice himself. Councilor Hogg: Mr. Chairman, since Councilor Trafford finds it so difficult to improve on my original wording, I accept. “Nobody without his dog on a lead is allowed in this Park.†Councilor Trafford: Mr. Chairman, I object. Strictly speaking, this notice would prevent me, as a citizen, who owns no dog, from walking in the Park without first acquiring one. Councilor Hogg (with some warmth): Very simply, then: “Dogs must be led in this Park.†Councilor Trafford: Mr. Chairman, I object: this reads as if it were a general injunction to the Borough to lead their dogs into the Park. Councilor Hogg interposed a remark for which he was called to order; upon his withdrawing it, it was directed to be expunged from the Minutes. The Chairman: Councilor Trafford, Councilor Hogg has had three tries; you have had only two . . . . Councilor Trafford: “All dogs must be kept on leads in this Park.†The Chairman: I see Councilor Hogg rising quite rightly to raise another objection. May I anticipate him with another amendment: “All dogs in this Park must be kept on the lead.†This draft was put to the vote and carried unanimously, with two abstentions. That's the end of the original but a question still remains! How are they going to get all the dogs in the park on the one and only lead? :big_grin:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now