Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Decca
Posted

Looks like a Chinese DC-5. Crappy drawing.i_dunno

 

Decca.

 

 

Guest Decca
Posted

Hi HiHo:- only that Boeing (which has nought to do with my post) bought Douglas out a few years ago.

 

DC stands for Douglas Commercial, as in DC-3 etc. And your picture has a profile not unlike a DC-5.

 

Regards, Decca.

 

EDIT: Haha, didn't notice I was right, thanks. Decca.

 

 

Guest Maj Millard
Posted

Hey friends, the DC-5 (only two built, one crashed,the other sold to either the japs or chinese) had FOUR engines and a triple tail like the Connie. They were trying to compete with the triple tailed Connie fashion.

 

I have WW2 mail envelopes that have DC-5s on the stamps, so they must have thought they had a bigger future.

 

Don't know what the twin engined job is but it looks like it could be Chinese ?......024_cool.gif.7a88a3168ebd868f5549631161e2b369.gif

 

 

Posted

A dozen were built.

 

Some were operated by KLM

 

and they did have 2 engines

 

and there is a boeing connection

 

 

 

Guest drizzt1978
Posted

Ok its a dc 5

 

Might help if the picture isnt a link to answer !!!!!

 

 

Guest Maj Millard
Posted

This must be an earlier model, guarantee there was a four engine DC-5 with a triple tail................................024_cool.gif.7a88a3168ebd868f5549631161e2b369.gif

 

 

Guest Decca
Posted

Well I'll be b-----.

 

Didn't realise there was a connection to Boeing. As far as I knew the two companies were highly competitive & aggressive in their marketing strategies, but maybe that didn't happen until the jet era. So where is this Link? (I'm a commuter dummy too!025_blush.gif.9304aaf8465a2b6ab5171f41c5565775.gif)

 

Decca.

 

 

Posted

The Boeing connection is that Bill Boeing purchased a DC 5 as his personal transport. I think that would have been after he sold out of the Boeing Aircraft company.

 

Interesting to know what the tripple tailed DC 5 that the Maj has knowledge of

 

 

Posted

Article.

 

Very worth a look too. Well done. The americans took to stressed skins (metal) almost universally. In the early 30's. Douglas had a fine reputation for airframe build quality. I have seen a DC-4 with over 70,000 hours pulled for full inspection and no cracks were evident in the airframe itself. Something unheard of in airframes today. The trouble with a highwing is the intrusion of the centre section spar in the ceiling of the fuselage, and the necessarily long undercarriage, which is hard to make strong and has a lot of drag when extended, causing loss of performance if you lose an engine on take-off. The Fokker F-27 which is mentioned in the article, used air (pneumatic) pressure to raise the gear, enabling it to retract more quickly and achieve a better initial climb performance.. Nev.

 

 

Guest Decca
Posted

Thanks Hihosland. Very interesting.

 

Can you give us another easy one?

 

Decca.

 

 

Guest Decca
Posted

Noah's Ark I think. It never flew, but managed to crash on a mountain.

 

Damn I've seen a photo of this somewhere. The radial type engine nacelles look odd with something like gypsy majors in them.

 

Facthunter might know. How about a clue; Bristol perhaps?

 

Decca:cool:.

 

 

Posted

No Idea.

 

Never seen anything like it. Its most likely wooden and the engines might be Pobjoy Cataracts. The props are wooden. The reason that I think the engines are as I suggest is the above centre siting of the prop drive. This is by a lay gear instead of the more common (and satisfactory) sun and planetary set-up. Nev.

 

 

Guest Maj Millard
Posted

Yes that DC-4E must have been the one I was thinking of. Thanks....................024_cool.gif.7a88a3168ebd868f5549631161e2b369.gif

 

Next one looks like a DC-10 in Continental colors ?

 

Christ, only the poms could design something that ugly, or maybe the french ?

 

 

Posted

another clue

 

This is not the same aircraft as posted before although both were built in response to the design spec created by the men from the ministry

 

guess02.jpg.de44b0ef536587b58e7b37c09ecd918e.jpg

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...