Guest Qwerty Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 Basscheffers I think that I have found it below. In AIP Enroute section Paragraph 77 77. FLIGHTS OVER WATER 77.7 SAR Alerting: a. VFR flights may choose to operate on reporting schedules for the over‐water stages of a flight. Schedules may be arranged before commencing the over‐water stage and terminate on completion of the crossing. b. VFR aircraft not equipped with radio which will enable continuous communication, or not radio equipped, must carry a survival beacon as prescribed in CAO 20.11, for the over‐water stages of the flight. From CAO 20.11 5.2 Life rafts 5.2.1 An aircraft that is flown over water at a distance from land greater than the permitted distance must carry, as part of its emergency and lifesaving equipment, sufficient life rafts to provide a place in a life raft for each person on board the aircraft. 5.2.1.1 For the purposes of paragraph 5.2.1, the permitted distance is: (a) in the case of an aircraft that has: (i) 4 engines; or (ii) 3 turbine engines; or (iii) 2 turbine engines and complies with section 20.7.1B; a distance equal to 120 minutes at normal cruising speed, or 400 miles, whichever is the less; or (b) in any other case — a distance equal to 30 minutes at normal cruising speed, or 100 miles, whichever is the less. CAO 20.11 in paragraph 5.1 says 5.1 Life jackets 5.1.1 Aircraft shall be equipped with 1 life jacket for each occupant when the aircraft is over water and at a distance from land: (a) in the case of a single engine aircraft — greater than that which would allow the aircraft to reach land with the engine inoperative; and So there you have it, basically no distance restriction, but you need life jackets and a radio or ELT . It is common practice to follow the islands. So when are we going to see you on this side of the pond. Cheers, Qwerty 77.1 Aircraft engaged in PVT, AWK, or CHTR operations, and which are normally prohibited by CAR 258 from over‐water flights because of their inability to reach land in the event of engine failure, may fly over water subject to compliance with the conditions in this section. These conditions are additional to the requirements for flight over land. 77.2 In the case of passenger‐carrying CHTR operations, the distance from land areas suitable for an emergency landing must not exceed 25NM. In the case of helicopters, a fixed platform or a vessel suitable for an emergency landing, or for seaplanes an area of water suitable for an emergency landing and located adjacent to land may be considered acceptable for this requirement. 77.3 There is no limitation for PVT, AWK or freight‐only CHTR operations. 77.4 Each occupant of the aircraft must wear a life jacket during the flight over water unless exempted from doing so under the terms of CAO 20.11. 77.5 A meteorological forecast must be obtained. 77.6 VFR flights are required to submit a SARTIME flight notification to ATS or leave a Flight Note with a responsible person.
sain Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 Umm... if its an RA-Aus plane then the rules are probably different (see http://www.raa.asn.au/operations/9555.pdf (CAO 95.55, but 95.10 and 95.32 have the same wording) basically gives a 20Km max distance from land - if your plane is fitted with floatation devices capable of keeping it afloat, and you and your passenger is wearing a life jacket. If you don't have that then its max glide or 20Km, whichever is the lesser.
Matt Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 Interesting thread...many an RA-Aus aircraft has flown to and from Tasmania via either Flinders Island or King Island using overwater sked calls as per ERSA requirements for Bass Straight crossings. I'm sure Eugene has an opinion on it, I believe he's done it himself a few times.
Guest Qwerty Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 Crap.... I was under the impression that Para 77 of AIP applied. I'll call Eugene when the Tax Office finally let me off hold.
sain Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 Actually having a look at google earth then its entirely possible to fly the aus to tas (or reverse) without ever being more than 20Km from land (for a given definition of land - some of the islands probably arn't big enough to land on). So its at least technically possible to do it. I believe you can also apply for an exemption, though I have no idea what the process would be.
Guest Qwerty Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 I spoke to Eugene...its complicated but for us, for now, we operate under the 20 km rule in CAO 95.55 Cl 5.1 © (i). Bass strait crossings are legal (thank god, I've done 20 odd). So....there is nothing stopping you. Get a life jacket, a wx report, set up over water skeds with air services and come on down. I appologise for the eariler mix up, I sometimes get confused between what I do under RAAus and what I do with my PPL, It takes a bit of keeping up with. Cheers, Qwerty
sain Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 Thanks for the word-from-eugene, its nice to have the official clarification.
Guest basscheffers Posted September 5, 2009 Posted September 5, 2009 I spoke to Eugene...its complicated but for us, for now, we operate under the 20 km rule in CAO 95.55 Cl 5.1 © (i).Bass strait crossings are legal (thank god, I've done 20 odd). Did he say why they are legal? Because there are some rocks that you would prefer to avoid in favour of a ditching that count as "land"? Don't get me wrong, I'd love to do it and I would feel perfectly happy to take a well maintained aircraft over much longer crossing, equipped with proper safety gear. Just curious.
Guest Qwerty Posted September 6, 2009 Posted September 6, 2009 The regs say somewhere that the land is to be suitable for a landing. Landing on some of the islands would probably not be pretty. But legal just the same. Part of the "complicated" that I was refering to is that Eugene is going to present a case for RAAus regs for over water flight to refer to the GA regs which will make life easier.
Guest basscheffers Posted September 6, 2009 Posted September 6, 2009 The regs say somewhere that the land is to be suitable for a landing. Landing on some of the islands would probably not be pretty. But legal just the same. I don't think these are suitable to land on! :) But ditching right next to them and hopfully climbing on to them does sound safer than open water. I do hope we get the same rules as GA for overwater. It'll make it easier for me to go west from here without a detour.
turboplanner Posted September 7, 2009 Posted September 7, 2009 I recall seeing, in the last couple of years, the island route spelled out, island by island via the Flinders Island route from Gippsland, possibly in a magazine, possibly GA, but for the life of me can't remember. Someone may be lucky with a google search.
Guest Qwerty Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 Turbo, here's the Bass Strait route Cape Portland Cape Barren Is Flinders Is Deal Is Hogan Is Cliffy Is Wilsons Prom (or Yarram to say gday to Jim and David and for fuel)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now