Admin Posted November 11, 2009 Posted November 11, 2009 This is a great video in the news story: http://www.recreationalflying.com/index.php?pageid=newsreader&news=http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/11/incredible-new-look-at-us-airways-flight-1549/
Guest Maj Millard Posted November 11, 2009 Posted November 11, 2009 Smooth as.......I like his use of the word "unable"....we always have that option as PIC.
Thx1137 Posted November 12, 2009 Posted November 12, 2009 It seems he was questioned about why he said "brace for impact" instead of "brace for water impact". He said: "I tend to think that I wish I'd had more time to more fully apprise the flight attendants of the situation that we faced. I probably spent some amount of time -- I would guess I had maybe four or five seconds to decide to make the announcement and what I should say and I chose my words carefully. My highest priority, at that moment, was to avoid passenger impact injury. I didn't know at that moment how successful I would be in trading air speed for sink rate to cushion the touchdown, so my immediate concern, my highest priority, had to be to avoid passenger injury at landing, so I chose the word impact and brace to indicate that they needed to brace themselves to avoid impact injury. I knew that the flight attendants would do their assessment prior to opening the doors and I wish I could've told them there was a water landing, but had I done that, they might've begun getting people to put on life vests and not being in the brace position at impact, so it was a balancing act for the situation that we faced and the time that we had available."
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now