dazza 38 Posted November 19, 2009 Posted November 19, 2009 Just checked out titan a/c web site. The titan mustang looks nice. Does anybody know much about it ?
Matt Posted November 19, 2009 Posted November 19, 2009 One person who can tell you a lot about them is Jim Wickam who fly's out of Tyabb in Victoria - he's built at least two of them, both beautifully built and great looking aeroplanes.
sleemanj Posted November 19, 2009 Posted November 19, 2009 There's qute a number of them flying in New Zealand (no smart remarks about our Air Force please :patch:), they sure are nice looking machines. Ivan (& Sandy) Campbell - Titan T-51 Mustang - are the distributors in this part of the world and they have done some real good work in assembling them. I'm sure they'd be more than happy to talk to you.
dazza 38 Posted November 19, 2009 Author Posted November 19, 2009 There's qute a number of them flying in New Zealand (no smart remarks about our Air Force please :patch:), they sure are nice looking machines.Ivan (& Sandy) Campbell - Titan T-51 Mustang - are the distributors in this part of the world and they have done some real good work in assembling them. I'm sure they'd be more than happy to talk to you. Thanks mate:clap:
Guest Walter Buschor Posted November 19, 2009 Posted November 19, 2009 There is a guy building one at Gympie Airfield. I forgot his name but he works on it daily in the "biggest" hangar. It will be a nice plane when finished and I have dropped in a few times to check on the progress. It certanly is not far from Boonah and worth a flight to Gympie to check it out. The work involved is daunting though. safe flying Walter
dazza 38 Posted November 20, 2009 Author Posted November 20, 2009 Sounds like a good plan Walter. Thanks
Sloper Posted December 14, 2009 Posted December 14, 2009 Can anybody tell me what options are availbale for registering a completed T-51? regards Bruce
Downunder Posted December 25, 2009 Posted December 25, 2009 I made some enquiries a while ago when the 750 kg limit looked good. Do-able as a single seater on RAA rego but still needs to be kept light. Look into the engine weights and proposed fuel capacity. My opinion is it would probably be best as VH exp with a honda or isuzu V6.
Guest 172M Posted December 26, 2009 Posted December 26, 2009 FWIW. The two 75% P51's that Jim Wickam operates are not Titan Aircraft. They are all composite, both running around 500hp all Ally Chevs with redrives and four blade C/S props and yep, sound great and go like a cut cats! built under VH EXP.( stall speed is 70 odd knots) Have a great New Year
Brumby Aircraft Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 Jim does have one Titan mustang ,PG aviation is almost near completion of there two seat plug that will be a carbon fibre shell ,Chrome molly fueslage , And all components made on there CNC . It will have the choice of two engines Rotax or the Isuzu V 6 and is 3/4 scale . The Rotax version is designed to fit in the RA AUS registration and will have the same docile characteristics as the Brumby range of aircraft allowing safe flying for low time pilots . Those pilots requiring some thing with a bit more punch can use the V6
fly_tornado Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 When I was in SLC I saw a T51 fuselage hanging from the ceiling at the Motionaero garage. It looks like a lot of work.
Brumby Aircraft Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 This one will be all pre fabricated and not quite as complicated ,Hence the carbon fire shell saves monthe of sheet work . These will be only done in kits with all components manufactured . 1
shu77 Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 I had the same opinon that if you were going to build one of these you would want a nice throaty sounding V6 and the ability to do aerobatics
Brumby Aircraft Posted December 4, 2012 Posted December 4, 2012 Yes and know ,The RAA style is designed to be as cheap as possible therefore the Rotax will suit a range of people that can build a quality aircraft at a reosonable price . Once you step up to yhe V6 it adds cost as it is a very different inatalation . I agree it will sound much better though .It is important to cater for both markets we will run the V6 in the first one here . These are not really designed as a great aerobatic aircraft will get some pics up soon , Cheers
pylon500 Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 Mustangs, mustangs, mustangs everywhere! Seems there's a good choice of scaled mustangs available now (working up from small); W.A.R. Mustang 53% http://www.waraircraftreplicas.com/ Falconaravia P51 66% http://www.falconaravia.com/ F.E.W. Mustang 66% http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FEWbuilders/ Stuart Mustang 70% http://www.seas.ucla.edu/~osmith/s51/ Thunder Mustang 74% http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papa_51_Thunder_Mustang Loehle 5151 75% http://www.loehle.com/MustangKit.htm Titan 51B & D 75% http://www.titanaircraft.com/t-51d.php Jurca Mustang 77% http://www.marcel-jurca.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=191&Itemid=238&lang=en And the latest offering, from Germany; Scalewings FK 51 70% http://www.scalewings.com/mu%20specifications%20englisch.htm There are also a couple of places set up to make 100% replicas of p51D and B models. Don't think anyone has done a Hawker Tempest yet..... 1
rgmwa Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 Interesting comparison between the Thunder Mustang and the original. Similar speeds but almost twice the climb rate (and 300kt cruise)! Edit: Oops, table formatting got lost when I posted it, but you can still follow the numbers... Specifications Thunder Mustang North American P-51D Mustang Powerplant Falconer V-12, 640 horsepower (480 kW) Rolls-Royce Merlin V-1650-7, 1,490 hp (1,110 kW) Displacement 601 cu in 1649 cu in Propeller MT 94" 4-blade constant speed Hamilton Standard 134" 4-blade Length 24.2 ft (7.4 m) 32.2 ft (9.8 m) Frontal Area 8.1 sq ft (0.75 m2) 13.4 sq ft (1.24 m2) Wing Span 23.8 ft (7.3 m) 37.0 ft (11.3 m) Wing Area 104 sq ft (9.7 m2) 237.75 sq ft (22.088 m2) Wing Loading 28.84 lb/sq ft 49.2 lb/sq ft Power Loading 4.69 lb/hp 7.78 lb/hp Gross Weight 3,200 lb (1,500 kg) 11,600 lb (5,300 kg) Empty Weight 2,200 lb (1,000 kg) 7,635 lb (3,463 kg) Useful Load 1,000 lb (450 kg) 3,965 lb (1,798 kg) Payload w/full Fuel 400 lb (180 kg) 2,885 lb (1,309 kg) Basic Fuel Capacity 102 gallons (in wings) 180 gallons (in wings) Baggage Capacity 50 lb (23 kg) N/A Performance Rate of Climb @ gross 5200 ft/min 2800 ft/min Maximum Level Speed @ Sea Level 326 kts (375 mph) 326 kn (375 mph) 380 kts (437 mph @ 25000 ft) Cruise Speed @ 75% Power 300 kts (340 mph) 250 kts (300 mph) Fuel Consumption 22-25 gal/h 50-75 gal/h Range 1300 NM 700 NM Service Ceiling 25,000 ft (7,600 m) 46,000 ft (14,000 m) Limiting and Recommended Airspeeds Vx (best angle of climb) 87 kts 87 kts Vy (best rate of climb) 156 kts 148 kts Va (design maneuvering) 222 kts 226 kts Vfe (max flaps extended) 165 kts 143 kts Vle (max landing gear extended) 148 kts 148 kts Vne (never exceed) 439 kts 439 kts Vsl (stall, clean) 77 kts 92 kts Vso (stall, in landing config.) 68 kts 88 kts Best Glide 153 kts 152 kts rgmwa
Mick Posted December 13, 2012 Posted December 13, 2012 Don't think anyone has done a Hawker Tempest yet..... [ATTACH=full]19954[/ATTACH] Is that Tempest pic for real or photoshopped? If it is for real I need info!!! The Tempest is my favourite fighter, plan on doing a large scale model one day! 1
pylon500 Posted December 13, 2012 Posted December 13, 2012 plan on doing a large scale model one day I started doing some drawings for something a bit bigger, but I don't see myself having any time to do anything in the foreseeable future:no: As for the photo, unfortunately yes, photoshop. Just trying to inspire myself while playing with CAD Truth is, (and looking at your avatar) I am more likely to build the Hurricane I started drawing a few years back. https://plus.google.com/photos/113292981019876413104/albums/5212775815502683841/5315228105331359986?banner=pwa 1
shu77 Posted December 13, 2012 Posted December 13, 2012 I was going to make the hurricane my next awesome LSA thread: http://www.flyinglegend.it/ The only issue I can see is that its on the European 472Kg MTOW.
pylon500 Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 I was going to make the hurricane my next awesome LSA thread: Personally I would stay away from hoping to achieve LSA status. That said, if this is 472kg MTOW, it fits 19-xxxx. Not sure why people want to build/fly 'Walter Mitty' machines like this, and carry passengers? I figure, if you want a two seater, build a two seater Just me photoshopping again although some of my initial drawings here; https://plus.google.com/photos/113292981019876413104/albums/5212775815502683841/5424354393046479058?banner=pwa 1
shu77 Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 I read a review that suggested that the second seat helps justify it to the wife :)
turboplanner Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 I started doing some drawings for something a bit bigger, but I don't see myself having any time to do anything in the foreseeable future:no:As for the photo, unfortunately yes, photoshop. Just trying to inspire myself while playing with CAD [ATTACH=full]19962[/ATTACH] Truth is, (and looking at your avatar) I am more likely to build the Hurricane I started drawing a few years back. https://plus.google.com/photos/113292981019876413104/albums/5212775815502683841/5315228105331359986?banner=pwa Some very professional sketches, drawings and renderings in that lot Pylon
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now