Guest sirius Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 From EAA website news; EAA Video Player
Guest Qwerty Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 No. RAAus reg is restricted to propellor driven.
Ultralights Posted December 24, 2009 Posted December 24, 2009 turbine blades could be considered very small and fast rotating propellors?
tangocharlie123 Posted December 25, 2009 Posted December 25, 2009 TurboProp The same company that makes the jet engine also makes a small turboprop now that may be allowed. TurboJet PBS Velká Bíte?, a.s. ... Turbojet engine TJ100 TurboProp PBS Velká Bíte?, a.s. ... Turbovrtulový motor TP 100 Cheers and Merry Christmas.
Guest Qwerty Posted December 25, 2009 Posted December 25, 2009 Tango is right, the regs from memory are "single engine propellor driven." I'd be willing to bet that a turbo prop is legal. and I have just the application for one too.
Guest check-in Posted December 26, 2009 Posted December 26, 2009 Any idea of the fuel capacity and burn? If it's like many other jets it will need almost its own weight in fuel to go anywhere. But I would LOVE one!
tangocharlie123 Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Ok Qwerty Top secret or not what do you plan to use one in. Not the Jabiru I hope. Cheers
Guest Qwerty Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Tango, Amongst other things, I am designing a flying boat (well two actually) and a turbo prop with beta would be perfect in these applications, I'm looking into it (the turbo prop, I mean). Its a year or two off unless I start getting orders. I've got several other projects to get flying before I can apply myself to the flying boats and just to make matters interesting, I lose the laser cutter I've been using and it won't be replaced until Feb some time. Cheers, Qwerty:boring:
flie43 Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Hey Qwerty we had an airboat but was really really low altitude stuff. Good luck with the flying boat. Terry
Guest Qwerty Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Thanks, What I'm doing is designing a super efficient ground effect machine, it turns out that in order to get the maximum efficiency from the thing, it needs so much lift that it will actually fly. So my ground effect machine will need to be registered as an aircraft and you will need a pilots licence (as opposed to a boat licence) to drive the thing. It will be capable of sustained cruise flight and will also be an anphib. I am guessing that if you leave ground effect you will need to ensure that you are below MTOW for your category?? Cheers, Qwerty
tangocharlie123 Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Thanks Qwerty That sounds interesting when you think the time is right would you releease further info I know for commercial reasons you can't at the moment. Cheers
Guest Qwerty Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 What do you want to know? Its early in the design phase but I have a basic layout and construction.
Yenn Posted December 28, 2009 Posted December 28, 2009 A friend of mine worked for quite some time developing "ekranoplanes", which is the Russian name for ground effect vehicles. I believe they got them flying up in Cairns but eventually they folded. The Russians had some very large ekranoplanes years ago, but the never became popular. The problems I see are having to travel at high speeds to get lift, but being close enough to the surface to collide with shipping
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now