Jump to content

jackc

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,135

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

 Content Type 

Everything posted by jackc

  1. jackc
    On principle, I would have stood my ground because RAA requirements were complied with on the day. So they changed their mind? I think RAA gets a thrill out of making things hard? Or has the Bristell fiasco spooked them? Not sure that is done and dusted either, from what I hear. 🤢
  2. jackc
    That, looks like a drum full of RAA Brown snakes 🤩 I have to ask, is RAAus on a witch hunt, looking to ground aircraft? Give members a hard time? Being a member of a company is a problem? No wonder I believe we need FAR Part 103. 🤩
  3. jackc
    The quality of that report equals the same as a Billycart losing a back wheel 🤩 Need to do better than that….
  4. jackc
    So, the kit maker must have sanctioned the 544 rating at some time? They would have been aware of what was going on in Australia ? Could an engineer certify the 544 MTOW? Now have there been any structural problems with this model of aircraft? And crashes with an adverse investigation outcome, due to airframe failure?
  5. jackc
    Yes, but it’s not……you should have heard the attitude I got over it, there was no reason to say what they said…….I was talking to an aviator friend about it tonight, he said a few choice words an added, just de register it tell RAA to go jump, and fly the thing. Shades of FAR Part 103 🤩🤩only I think the Thruster may be too heavy 🤢 I guess I could go VH and tell RAA to go jump? Now there is a thought 🤩
  6. jackc
    WHY did RAA drop your MTOW back to 490?
  7. jackc
    So you begrudge anyone suggesting something in Aviation that we could benefit from? I might add that we once had? Just because we don’t have the unlicenced category, you don’t want it? Well that’s OK, but don’t down others who would want FAR Part 103, I have private conversations and phone calls with people, who think it would be great. I have to ask Turbs, do you want to actively discourage an adoption of FAR Part 103 in Australia?
  8. jackc
    So what you saying is, an unlicenced FAR Part 103 aviation sector is not respectable? Maybe I should pass your comment to EAA U.S. as a I am a member there, they can comment on the standing of Part 103 operations in the U.S.? But really, Australia has no idea on many things, just look around at the way we run many things here. In your opinion on many things, itsYOUR way…….or the highway? Not very progressive, is it 🤢
  9. jackc
    Looks like there could be some room for FAA FAR Part 103 🤩 SAFA?
  10. jackc
    RAAus grounded it from training 🤢 Some b/s they are trying to pull on me, that I need to sort out. And IF the crunch comes to the crunch……I have way to fix that too. 👍
  11. jackc
    Well we accept International Drivers Licences here 🤩 Maybe My training certificate will cover me for Part 103 here, too.🤩 Look Turbo, I am hearing you but we should have back what we once had BEFORE RAAus. And I am pushing that era as a low budget, no b/s method of Aviation that RAAus don’t want, because of loss of income to them. Well, it’s not their choice, the buck stops with CASA and we need pressure put on them…….
  12. jackc
    The moment you fly an unregistered aircraft, you come under the long tentacles of CASA as RAAus are not part of enforcing that. Mind you, CASA will be very pissed about it, but they have done nothing to already police many unregistered aircraft and their similarly unlicenced pilots. Queensland is a big state 🤩 Training is done in 2 seat aircraft signed off for the purpose. You simply get a training certificate, which you don’t even legally need in the U.S.
  13. jackc
    Our freedom to fly unlicenced disappeared with RAAus 🤢 How ever Aviation has forged ahead under RAAus to a point where cost will stifle it, in the long run. I spoke with the owner of the WEB site and our discussion went down a mineshaft, I followed up with an email to further explain, it was ignored. One of his suppliers offered to sell me a Part 103 Aircraft direct. Having said this, I am considering flying to the U.S. and doing training for Part 103 Aircraft and looking at what is available. I have had some offers for training. IF I buy an aircraft, you don’t need to guess what I will do with it. I have a friend who imports aircraft who said to let him know with a possibility of including my kit, with his container of aircraft, at his convenience. Before everyone gets all bitter and twisted, being illegal etc. Remember, illegal is….a sick bird 🤩 As an aside I will have a Part 103 training certificate….. People would ask WHY? I say, because I CAN 🤩🤩
  14. jackc
    Skippy, yeah it’s my useless opinion……people can make their own minds up 👍
  15. jackc
    They are out there……in the U.S.A
  16. jackc
    Skippy, did you take your meds today 🤩 it’s just an opinion…..I am not forecasting the end of Aviation 🤩
  17. jackc
    Just drive slow in an old Landcruiser with a bull bar, they avoid me like the plague 🤩
  18. jackc
    Still got it, just installed Avmap and Becker second COM radio along with Skyecho.
  19. jackc
    The training use will be limited, number of circuits before recharge needed? Probably no cross country endorsements? Aircraft limited range will mean no real hire out possibilities. This will mean far higher hourly training cost. Not to mention train in electric than add extra hours for training on piston type, to get signed off for RPC..
  20. jackc
    But I wonder IF CASA is able to look at this new technology, in a timely and knowledgeable way. Regulatory work from them is usually a hurry up AND……wait regime. 🤢
  21. jackc
    ‘How any flying school makes money is beyond me but if we don't support local then we will all end up the poorer.’ Some flying schools, spec up their training aircraft with top shelf options, which makes their ROI expensive. A school I want to transfer to, after Covid had upspec Foxbats, full glass cockpits etc etc. The hourly cost was $100 per hour more the I was paying, that flying school is no longer in business 🤢
  22. jackc
    They should do ONE aircraft, and then fly the wings off it, testing extensively before finally committing.
  23. jackc
    OK, I will say this…..our sector of Aviation is near the bottom of the ladder, and everything that is part of it has an economic that is reasonably cost viable.so far. Seeing what Rotax are up to, and their support attitude these days. I would not use one of their new engines. Consider IF Lycoming made a drop in engine to replace a Jabiru? It would cost a mint, and probably run forever, so we have to accept what we can afford. I would put a new Jabiru in an aircraft, before a Rotax……because of support alone. My dreamy choice would be a Verner Radial, only because I have Dinosaur attitude to everything in my life. I would rather ride in a Super Constellation before a 787 or 380.
  24. jackc
    Did not see that one, I bought a set of 903 series manuals from the U.S. when I got my truck. We had the earlier 855 Series 300hp V8 in our Army 5t LARC V. Landing Craft
  25. jackc
    Even Boeing cut corners, like most of the others, too 🤩
×
×
  • Create New...