I spoke to Lee Ungermann about this subject tonight, and he said it was OK to pass on the following information. It was stated early in this thread that the major factor behind John McCormick's suddenly negative view of the proposal to allow a CTA endorsement for RAA pilots was a result of some horrible things he viewed at Narromine.
Lee states that this is not true, and that John wasn't even at Narromine.
While there are a number of reasons behind the decision (and RAAus are working hard on these), one of the major factors was indeed the action of some RAAus pilots. There were a number of CTA incursions and subsequent "please explains" from CASA at a particularly bad time in the process. The CTA endorsement is not dead, but it's recovery and release from intensive care would be greatly aided by all RAAus pilots striving to do the right thing. Our safety record is looking fantastic now. Our compliance record should now follow.
Cheers,
Ross
PS - I was at Narromine for 3 days and I only saw one dodgy bit of airmanship - and that was more bad decision making than willful disregard for rules.
Well - 2 if you count the Cirrus taking off into the storm, but I think it was BrentC who explained the decision process there, and it wasn't all bad.
There was some idiot eating breakfast off his engine cowling, but that was more poor planning.