Quote:
Originally Posted by bacchus
Aircraft advertised with 270 hrs TT ( changed slightly to avoid identification )
When wanting to confirm the motor was 270 hrs from new I was told it had a " Floods Overhaul " 270 hrs ago , no probs.
I don't know about you, but I don't think I'd get a new engine overhauled. So if he asked about the hrs, and he said it had done 270 hrs TT since overhaul, I (myself) would automatically think it has done a lot more hrs, or isn't a new engine (from new) for that matter. Sure it wasn't stated in the add, but I guess that is why they supply their contact details?
Tomo ,
If you wish to quote me , please try and read the quote correctly and in text.
It is screaming obvious that the engine had done more hours than 270 hrs
AFTER being told of the " Overhaul " The question to CONFIRM the engine had done these hours from new was asked prior to being told of the " Tear Down and Inspection " as Rotax describe it which has already been debated.
For you to suggest I " LOOK DOWN " on someone because the engine took a bit to start OFFENDS ME NO END !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I LOOK DOWN on nobody !!!!
(comment removed) - mod
It used to be said Two ears one Mouth , that translates into Two eyes one finger in Modern Speak.
As far as going against me ( removed ) Free world , Free speech
Sorry to others not normally like this.