Should we expect broad-based advocacy from RA-AUS, or is that beyond their remit? I note they promote their work with CASA and at least Michael Monck got a sound bite in the video.
From RA-AUS website….
“As an RAAus member, we do the work dealing with CASA for you. We oversee your training, aircraft maintenance, and medical standards.
We are also in constant contact with CASA, working to protect your privileges and ensure you enjoy a simple, yet safe rule set.”
AOPA have a reputation for aggressively defending the rights of the VH world to anyone who would listen. Should we expect RA-AUS to do the same for the numbered fleet when ‘hobby’ aircraft are questioned, or would that simply undermine their (subservient) relationship with CASA?
So, if not RA-AUS as the aggressive advocate each time someone threatens the freedoms of the recreational flyer, then who?
Thoughts, opinions, anyone ?