The Savannah is an excellent aircraft.
But bang for buck in November I would argue that 1891 Skyranger could move further up Maj’s ratings
Comparing 1891 and 1904 the two aircraft essentially share basic configuration, performance envelope, fuel economy, operating costs and powerplants
The Savannah is a better STOL performer however if I ever had a Skyranger and a Savannah in a situation where the Savannah could fly out and the Skyranger couldn’t I’d be very apprehensive of launching the Savvy.
Riveted alloy construction vs bolted alloy. The Savvy may last longer but both will out live most pilots. The Skyranger will be quicker, easier and cheaper to repair damage.
Fabric vs alloy skin. Hail or a dropped wrench that would seriously damage the Savannah will bounce off the Skyranger. Small hangar rash lesions to the skin easier and quicker to repair in the Skyranger.
The metal will fare much better in the sun whereas UV exposure will degrade the Skyranger skin. With reasonable care and a hangar the Skyranger skin should last 10 years at least and then is easily replaced for about $5000.
The Savvy has longer range, tundra tyres and better instrumentation.
Time in service. At 380 vs 160 hrs the Savannah is 3 years of average rec pilot use older than the Sky.
Price to buy, At a saving in excess of $20,000 I’d vote for the Skyranger even after budgeting for a new fabric
Similar bang, a lot less buck
Thanks Maj for your valuable thoughts, analysis, work and contribution.
Please keep up the good work
And lets all keep debating our favourite topics flying and aircraft.